Seek Returns logo

MBLY vs. SE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MBLY and SE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MBLY is a standard domestic listing, while SE trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMBLYSE
Company NameMobileye Global Inc.Sea Limited
CountryIsraelSingapore
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryCommunication Services
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsEntertainment
Market Capitalization11.24 billion USD111.03 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 26, 2022October 20, 2017
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MBLY and SE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MBLY vs. SE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMBLYSE
5-Day Price Return-0.58%4.63%
13-Week Price Return-13.63%16.72%
26-Week Price Return-23.83%37.68%
52-Week Price Return-8.90%126.65%
Month-to-Date Return-3.02%19.73%
Year-to-Date Return-30.67%76.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.70M5.73M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.38M4.42M
3-Month Volatility51.23%50.73%
Beta0.491.56

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MBLY

-24.48%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

MBLY has a negative Return on Equity of -24.48%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SE

13.69%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

SE’s Return on Equity of 13.69% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MBLY vs. SE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MBLY

-153.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

MBLY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -153.91%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SE

6.17%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

SE’s Net Profit Margin of 6.17% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MBLY vs. SE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MBLY

-160.62%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

MBLY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -160.62%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SE

7.63%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

SE’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.63% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MBLY vs. SE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMBLYSE
Return on Equity (TTM)-24.48%13.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.52%5.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-153.91%6.17%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-160.62%7.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.80%44.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

6.91

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

MBLY’s Current Ratio of 6.91 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

SE

1.55

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

SE’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MBLY vs. SE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

0.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MBLY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SE

0.65

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

SE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MBLY vs. SE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

-4.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

MBLY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.33. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SE

-6.05

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

SE has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MBLY vs. SE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMBLYSE
Current Ratio (MRQ)6.911.55
Quick Ratio (MRQ)5.971.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-4.33-6.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

MBLY vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MBLY vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

MBLY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MBLY vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

MBLY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MBLY vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMBLYSE
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

--

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

P/E Ratio data for MBLY is currently unavailable.

SE

88.79

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

At 88.79, SE’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Entertainment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MBLY vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

5.93

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 5.93, MBLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobile Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SE

5.48

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

SE’s P/S Ratio of 5.48 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MBLY vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

1.21

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

MBLY’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SE

9.79

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

SE’s P/B Ratio of 9.79 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MBLY vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMBLYSE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--88.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.935.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.219.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.3332.38