Seek Returns logo

MBLY vs. QS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MBLY and QS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMBLYQS
Company NameMobileye Global Inc.QuantumScape Corporation
CountryIsraelUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization11.24 billion USD4.56 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 26, 2022August 17, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MBLY and QS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MBLY vs. QS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMBLYQS
5-Day Price Return-0.58%1.77%
13-Week Price Return-13.63%102.77%
26-Week Price Return-23.83%54.81%
52-Week Price Return-8.90%38.32%
Month-to-Date Return-3.02%-6.40%
Year-to-Date Return-30.67%55.11%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.70M18.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.38M33.05M
3-Month Volatility51.23%136.91%
Beta0.494.80

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MBLY

-24.48%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

MBLY has a negative Return on Equity of -24.48%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

QS

-42.11%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

QS has a negative Return on Equity of -42.11%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MBLY vs. QS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MBLY

-153.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

MBLY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -153.91%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

QS

--

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

Net Profit Margin data for QS is currently unavailable.

MBLY vs. QS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MBLY

-160.62%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

MBLY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -160.62%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

QS

--

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

Operating Profit Margin data for QS is currently unavailable.

MBLY vs. QS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMBLYQS
Return on Equity (TTM)-24.48%-42.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.52%-36.91%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-153.91%--
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-160.62%--
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.80%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

6.91

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

MBLY’s Current Ratio of 6.91 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

QS

16.40

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

QS’s Current Ratio of 16.40 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MBLY vs. QS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

0.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MBLY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

QS

0.03

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, QS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MBLY vs. QS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

-4.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

MBLY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.33. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

QS

-0.05

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

QS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MBLY vs. QS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMBLYQS
Current Ratio (MRQ)6.9116.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)5.9716.22
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-4.33-0.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

MBLY vs. QS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MBLY vs. QS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

MBLY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

QS

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

QS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MBLY vs. QS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

MBLY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

QS

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

QS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MBLY vs. QS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMBLYQS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

--

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

P/E Ratio data for MBLY is currently unavailable.

QS

--

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

P/E Ratio data for QS is currently unavailable.

MBLY vs. QS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

5.93

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 5.93, MBLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobile Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

QS

--

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

P/S Ratio data for QS is currently unavailable.

MBLY vs. QS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

1.21

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

MBLY’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

QS

3.67

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

At 3.67, QS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobile Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MBLY vs. QS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMBLYQS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.93--
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.213.67
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.33--