Seek Returns logo

MBLY vs. MGA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MBLY and MGA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMBLYMGA
Company NameMobileye Global Inc.Magna International Inc.
CountryIsraelCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization11.27 billion USD13.38 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 26, 2022October 5, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MBLY and MGA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MBLY vs. MGA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMBLYMGA
5-Day Price Return1.07%3.06%
13-Week Price Return-21.47%25.19%
26-Week Price Return-12.30%22.63%
52-Week Price Return-1.88%18.85%
Month-to-Date Return0.79%4.60%
Year-to-Date Return-29.12%9.75%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.88M1.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.90M1.14M
3-Month Volatility42.50%25.24%
Beta0.491.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MBLY

-24.48%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.51%
Median
7.91%
Q1
5.60%
Min
-2.27%

MBLY has a negative Return on Equity of -24.48%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.51%
Median
7.91%
Q1
5.60%
Min
-2.27%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MBLY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MBLY

-153.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
13.51%
Q3
7.21%
Median
5.02%
Q1
2.32%
Min
-3.89%

MBLY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -153.91%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
13.51%
Q3
7.21%
Median
5.02%
Q1
2.32%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MBLY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MBLY

-160.62%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.92%
Q3
10.29%
Median
6.94%
Q1
3.64%
Min
-0.31%

MBLY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -160.62%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.92%
Q3
10.29%
Median
6.94%
Q1
3.64%
Min
-0.31%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MBLY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMBLYMGA
Return on Equity (TTM)-24.48%10.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.52%3.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-153.91%2.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-160.62%4.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.80%13.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

6.91

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
2.54
Median
1.80
Q1
1.36
Min
0.79

MBLY’s Current Ratio of 6.91 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
2.54
Median
1.80
Q1
1.36
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MBLY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

0.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.68
Median
0.38
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MBLY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.68
Median
0.38
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MBLY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

-4.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
80.10
Q3
35.45
Median
11.20
Q1
4.03
Min
-21.51

MBLY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.33. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
80.10
Q3
35.45
Median
11.20
Q1
4.03
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MBLY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMBLYMGA
Current Ratio (MRQ)6.911.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)5.970.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-4.338.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

MBLY vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MBLY vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
5.41%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.23%
Q1
1.18%
Min
0.00%

MBLY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MGA

4.08%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
5.41%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.23%
Q1
1.18%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.08%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MBLY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
99.04%
Q3
60.04%
Median
39.38%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

MBLY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
99.04%
Q3
60.04%
Median
39.38%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MBLY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMBLYMGA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%4.08%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%44.88%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

--

Automobile Components Industry

Max
32.42
Q3
21.41
Median
15.09
Q1
13.02
Min
2.51

P/E Ratio data for MBLY is currently unavailable.

MGA

11.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max
32.42
Q3
21.41
Median
15.09
Q1
13.02
Min
2.51

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 11.00 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MBLY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

6.07

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.13
Median
0.78
Q1
0.39
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 6.07, MBLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobile Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MGA

0.32

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.13
Median
0.78
Q1
0.39
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.32 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MBLY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

1.21

Automobile Components Industry

Max
3.57
Q3
1.91
Median
1.08
Q1
0.78
Min
0.46

MBLY’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max
3.57
Q3
1.91
Median
1.08
Q1
0.78
Min
0.46

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MBLY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMBLYMGA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--11.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.070.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.210.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.777.27