Seek Returns logo

MAS vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MAS and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMASVRSK
Company NameMasco CorporationVerisk Analytics, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsProfessional Services
Market Capitalization15.82 billion USD37.84 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980October 7, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MAS and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MAS vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMASVRSK
5-Day Price Return3.46%1.18%
13-Week Price Return19.95%-13.84%
26-Week Price Return-2.23%-8.34%
52-Week Price Return-3.50%0.62%
Month-to-Date Return10.94%-2.82%
Year-to-Date Return4.15%-1.66%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.21M1.15M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.38M0.93M
3-Month Volatility29.32%21.38%
Beta1.210.88

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MAS

279.76%

Building Products Industry

Max
48.58%
Q3
27.65%
Median
16.01%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-6.66%

MAS’s Return on Equity of 279.76% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Building Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VRSK

439.17%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 439.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MAS

10.51%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.11%
Q3
15.09%
Median
9.48%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-3.43%

MAS’s Net Profit Margin of 10.51% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Building Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VRSK

30.67%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

VRSK’s Net Profit Margin of 30.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MAS

16.40%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.67%
Q3
18.75%
Median
14.89%
Q1
8.70%
Min
-1.00%

MAS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.40% is around the midpoint for the Building Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VRSK

43.94%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

MAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMASVRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)279.76%439.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)15.55%19.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.51%30.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.40%43.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.25%69.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MAS

1.82

Building Products Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
2.03
Median
1.60
Q1
1.32
Min
0.88

MAS’s Current Ratio of 1.82 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VRSK

1.53

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MAS

14.33

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.66
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 14.33, MAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Building Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

VRSK

10.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.43, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MAS

12.73

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
15.31
Q1
6.06
Min
0.85

MAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMASVRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.821.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.061.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)14.3310.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.7343.51

Growth

Revenue Growth

MAS vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MAS vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MAS

1.63%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.56%
Q3
1.94%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

MAS’s Dividend Yield of 1.63% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRSK

0.62%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.62% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MAS

30.90%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.49%
Q1
16.25%
Min
0.00%

MAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.90% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRSK

25.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.76% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMASVRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.63%0.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.90%25.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MAS

19.32

Building Products Industry

Max
66.79
Q3
37.37
Median
21.86
Q1
17.57
Min
9.70

MAS’s P/E Ratio of 19.32 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VRSK

41.55

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 41.55 places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MAS

2.03

Building Products Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.25
Median
1.65
Q1
1.11
Min
0.34

MAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VRSK

12.75

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 12.75, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MAS

73.71

Building Products Industry

Max
13.31
Q3
6.85
Median
3.20
Q1
1.71
Min
0.73

At 73.71, MAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VRSK

139.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

At 139.79, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MAS vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMASVRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.3241.55
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.0312.75
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)73.71139.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.0837.30