Seek Returns logo

MAS vs. UPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MAS and UPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMASUPS
Company NameMasco CorporationUnited Parcel Service, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsAir Freight & Logistics
Market Capitalization14.75 billion USD70.96 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980November 10, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MAS and UPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MAS vs. UPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMASUPS
5-Day Price Return-1.66%-0.44%
13-Week Price Return9.37%-17.25%
26-Week Price Return-0.03%-24.75%
52-Week Price Return-15.77%-37.78%
Month-to-Date Return-4.09%-4.47%
Year-to-Date Return-3.00%-33.76%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.73M9.29M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.27M7.09M
3-Month Volatility27.14%30.00%
Beta1.191.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MAS

279.76%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

MAS’s Return on Equity of 279.76% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Building Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UPS

35.27%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.63%
Median
11.99%
Q1
7.41%
Min
2.11%

In the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s Return on Equity of 35.27% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MAS vs. UPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MAS

10.51%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

MAS’s Net Profit Margin of 10.51% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Building Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UPS

6.34%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
5.98%
Median
4.11%
Q1
2.45%
Min
0.50%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.34% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MAS vs. UPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MAS

16.40%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

MAS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.40% is around the midpoint for the Building Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UPS

9.30%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
11.33%
Q3
8.19%
Median
5.82%
Q1
3.63%
Min
1.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.30% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MAS vs. UPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMASUPS
Return on Equity (TTM)279.76%35.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)15.55%8.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.51%6.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.40%9.30%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.25%81.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MAS

1.82

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

MAS’s Current Ratio of 1.82 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UPS

1.32

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.73
Q3
1.33
Median
1.15
Q1
0.95
Min
0.61

UPS’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MAS vs. UPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MAS

14.33

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 14.33, MAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Building Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UPS

1.57

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.25
Median
0.77
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

UPS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.57. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MAS vs. UPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MAS

12.73

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

MAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UPS

9.59

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.92
Q1
6.34
Min
-0.60

UPS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MAS vs. UPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMASUPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.821.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.061.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)14.331.57
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.739.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

MAS vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MAS vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MAS

1.72%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

MAS’s Dividend Yield of 1.72% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UPS

7.61%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.20%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.55%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Yield of 7.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

MAS vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MAS

30.90%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

MAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.90% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UPS

94.15%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
60.17%
Q1
4.60%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 94.15% is in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MAS vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMASUPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.72%7.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.90%94.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MAS

18.35

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

MAS’s P/E Ratio of 18.35 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UPS

12.37

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
30.08
Q3
23.03
Median
18.40
Q1
12.84
Min
5.90

In the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s P/E Ratio of 12.37 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MAS vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MAS

1.93

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

MAS’s P/S Ratio of 1.93 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UPS

0.78

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.40
Median
0.63
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

UPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.78 aligns with the market consensus for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MAS vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MAS

73.71

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

At 73.71, MAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UPS

5.43

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
5.68
Q3
3.23
Median
1.97
Q1
1.31
Min
0.80

UPS’s P/B Ratio of 5.43 is in the upper tier for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MAS vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMASUPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.3512.37
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.930.78
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)73.715.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.3313.19