Seek Returns logo

MAS vs. RSG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MAS and RSG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMASRSG
Company NameMasco CorporationRepublic Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization15.63 billion USD72.67 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980July 1, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MAS and RSG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MAS vs. RSG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMASRSG
5-Day Price Return7.63%-1.23%
13-Week Price Return7.92%-3.61%
26-Week Price Return-3.63%5.04%
52-Week Price Return3.39%16.66%
Month-to-Date Return9.56%0.91%
Year-to-Date Return2.85%15.69%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.92M1.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.46M1.43M
3-Month Volatility35.77%20.20%
Beta1.200.61

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MAS

279.76%

Building Products Industry

Max
48.58%
Q3
27.65%
Median
16.01%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-6.66%

MAS’s Return on Equity of 279.76% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Building Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RSG

18.34%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

In the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, RSG’s Return on Equity of 18.34% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MAS vs. RSG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MAS

10.51%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.11%
Q3
15.09%
Median
9.48%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-3.43%

MAS’s Net Profit Margin of 10.51% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Building Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RSG

12.98%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.98% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MAS vs. RSG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MAS

16.40%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.67%
Q3
18.75%
Median
14.89%
Q1
8.70%
Min
-1.00%

MAS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.40% is around the midpoint for the Building Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RSG

20.24%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.24% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MAS vs. RSG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMASRSG
Return on Equity (TTM)279.76%18.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)15.55%6.50%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.51%12.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.40%20.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.25%42.28%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MAS

1.82

Building Products Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
2.03
Median
1.60
Q1
1.32
Min
0.88

MAS’s Current Ratio of 1.82 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RSG

0.66

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

RSG’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MAS vs. RSG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MAS

14.33

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.66
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 14.33, MAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Building Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

RSG

1.08

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

RSG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.08 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MAS vs. RSG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MAS

12.73

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
15.31
Q1
6.06
Min
0.85

MAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RSG

4.10

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

RSG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.10 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MAS vs. RSG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMASRSG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.820.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.060.60
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)14.331.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.734.10

Growth

Revenue Growth

MAS vs. RSG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MAS vs. RSG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MAS

1.68%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.56%
Q3
1.94%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

MAS’s Dividend Yield of 1.68% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RSG

0.98%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

RSG’s Dividend Yield of 0.98% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MAS vs. RSG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MAS

30.90%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.49%
Q1
16.25%
Min
0.00%

MAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.90% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RSG

33.52%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

RSG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.52% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MAS vs. RSG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMASRSG
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.68%0.98%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.90%33.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MAS

18.74

Building Products Industry

Max
66.79
Q3
37.37
Median
21.86
Q1
17.57
Min
9.70

MAS’s P/E Ratio of 18.74 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RSG

34.17

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

RSG’s P/E Ratio of 34.17 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MAS vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MAS

1.97

Building Products Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.25
Median
1.65
Q1
1.11
Min
0.34

MAS’s P/S Ratio of 1.97 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RSG

4.44

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

RSG’s P/S Ratio of 4.44 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MAS vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MAS

73.71

Building Products Industry

Max
13.31
Q3
6.85
Median
3.20
Q1
1.71
Min
0.73

At 73.71, MAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RSG

6.40

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

RSG’s P/B Ratio of 6.40 is in the upper tier for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MAS vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMASRSG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.7434.17
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.974.44
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)73.716.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.6330.81