MAR vs. SW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 24, 2025

Here’s a clear look at MAR and SW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	MAR	SW
Company Name	Marriott International, Inc.	Smurfit Westrock Plc
Country	United States	Ireland
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Materials
GICS Industry	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure	Containers & Packaging
Market Capitalization	71.54 billion USD	21.90 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	March 23, 1998	June 17, 2008
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MAR and SW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MAR vs. SW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	SW
5-Day Price Return	-1.13%	-4.05%
13-Week Price Return	-3.54%	-9.57%
26-Week Price Return	-8.57%	-23.24%
52-Week Price Return	17.05%	-3.54%
Month-to-Date Return	-0.11%	-5.48%
Year-to-Date Return	-5.52%	-22.11%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.19M	4.11M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.54M	3.61M
3-Month Volatility	21.41%	31.62%
Beta	1.38	1.10

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MAR

309.12%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 83.01%
Q3: 39.51%
Median: 17.38%
Q1: 5.32%
Min: -45.92%

MAR’s Return on Equity of 309.12% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SW

2.94%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 41.66%
Q3: 20.76%
Median: 14.35%
Q1: 6.55%
Min: 3.64%

A Return on Equity of 2.94% places SW below the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests challenges in efficiently using shareholder capital to generate profit, which could point to operational issues or a conservative capital structure.

MAR vs. SW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MAR

9.60%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 26.45%
Q3: 14.67%
Median: 8.69%
Q1: 3.34%
Min: -11.30%

MAR’s Net Profit Margin of 9.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SW

1.18%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 11.61%
Q3: 8.17%
Median: 4.91%
Q1: 4.20%
Min: 0.08%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Net Profit Margin of 1.18% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MAR vs. SW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MAR

15.10%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 38.76%
Q3: 21.15%
Median: 14.20%
Q1: 6.43%
Min: -14.56%

MAR’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.10% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SW

4.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 22.03%
Q3: 13.17%
Median: 8.87%
Q1: 6.86%
Min: 0.07%

SW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.20% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MAR vs. SW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	SW
Return on Equity (TTM)	309.12%	2.94%
Return on Assets (TTM)	9.28%	1.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	9.60%	1.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	15.10%	4.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	20.24%	19.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MAR

0.49

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 2.68
Q3: 1.62
Median: 1.11
Q1: 0.74
Min: 0.19

MAR’s Current Ratio of 0.49 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SW

1.45

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.13
Q3: 1.57
Median: 1.27
Q1: 1.13
Min: 0.58

SW’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MAR vs. SW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MAR

76.12

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 9.88
Q3: 4.54
Median: 1.52
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 76.12, MAR operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SW

0.79

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.50
Q3: 2.23
Median: 1.22
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.23

SW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MAR vs. SW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MAR

5.87

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 26.88
Q3: 11.95
Median: 3.87
Q1: 1.19
Min: -11.84

MAR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.87 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SW

2.41

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 13.16
Q3: 8.10
Median: 3.61
Q1: 2.94
Min: 1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MAR vs. SW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	SW
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.49	1.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.45	0.95
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	76.12	0.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	5.87	2.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

MAR vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MAR vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MAR

0.98%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 5.88%
Q3: 2.37%
Median: 0.68%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MAR’s Dividend Yield of 0.98% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SW

3.50%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 7.37%
Q3: 4.07%
Median: 3.33%
Q1: 1.72%
Min: 0.00%

SW’s Dividend Yield of 3.50% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MAR vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MAR

28.74%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 127.31%
Q3: 56.79%
Median: 19.58%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MAR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.74% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SW

85.87%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 221.20%
Q3: 119.52%
Median: 58.05%
Q1: 28.91%
Min: 0.00%

SW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MAR vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	SW
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.98%	3.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	28.74%	85.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MAR

29.47

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 59.44
Q3: 33.98
Median: 22.25
Q1: 15.53
Min: 7.61

MAR’s P/E Ratio of 29.47 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SW

41.59

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 35.98
Q3: 27.87
Median: 16.15
Q1: 14.38
Min: 8.20

At 41.59, SW’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MAR vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MAR

2.83

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 7.74
Q3: 3.88
Median: 2.05
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.17

MAR’s P/S Ratio of 2.83 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SW

0.49

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.91
Q3: 1.67
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.64
Min: 0.30

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s P/S Ratio of 0.49 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MAR vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MAR

366.34

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 20.90
Q3: 9.78
Median: 4.29
Q1: 2.22
Min: 0.47

At 366.34, MAR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SW

1.23

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 5.28
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.57
Min: 0.89

SW’s P/B Ratio of 1.23 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MAR vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	SW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	29.47	41.59
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.83	0.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	366.34	1.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	42.62	42.07