MAR vs. PHM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 18, 2025

Here’s a clear look at MAR and PHM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	MAR	PHM
Company Name	Marriott International, Inc.	PulteGroup, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure	Household Durables
Market Capitalization	73.21 billion USD	25.64 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	March 23, 1998	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MAR and PHM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MAR vs. PHM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	PHM
5-Day Price Return	3.50%	7.70%
13-Week Price Return	-0.83%	21.98%
26-Week Price Return	-10.98%	18.13%
52-Week Price Return	25.63%	6.56%
Month-to-Date Return	2.22%	15.09%
Year-to-Date Return	-3.31%	19.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.73M	1.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.69M	2.11M
3-Month Volatility	23.79%	39.75%
Beta	1.38	1.32

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MAR

309.12%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 83.01%
Q3: 39.51%
Median: 17.38%
Q1: 5.32%
Min: -45.92%

MAR’s Return on Equity of 309.12% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PHM

22.59%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 26.99%
Q3: 17.28%
Median: 12.66%
Q1: 7.34%
Min: 0.07%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, PHM’s Return on Equity of 22.59% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MAR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MAR

9.60%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 26.45%
Q3: 14.67%
Median: 8.69%
Q1: 3.34%
Min: -11.30%

MAR’s Net Profit Margin of 9.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PHM

15.50%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 15.50%
Q3: 8.99%
Median: 6.57%
Q1: 4.33%
Min: -0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.50% places PHM in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MAR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MAR

15.10%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 38.76%
Q3: 21.15%
Median: 14.20%
Q1: 6.43%
Min: -14.56%

MAR’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.10% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PHM

20.22%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 20.22%
Q3: 12.29%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 6.30%
Min: -1.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.22% places PHM in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MAR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	PHM
Return on Equity (TTM)	309.12%	22.59%
Return on Assets (TTM)	9.28%	15.84%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	9.60%	15.50%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	15.10%	20.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	20.24%	27.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MAR

0.49

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 2.68
Q3: 1.62
Median: 1.11
Q1: 0.74
Min: 0.19

MAR’s Current Ratio of 0.49 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PHM

4.93

Household Durables Industry

Max: 9.23
Q3: 4.50
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.29
Min: 0.70

PHM’s Current Ratio of 4.93 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MAR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MAR

76.12

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 9.88
Q3: 4.54
Median: 1.52
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 76.12, MAR operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PHM

0.17

Household Durables Industry

Max: 1.84
Q3: 0.90
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.19
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, PHM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MAR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MAR

5.87

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 26.88
Q3: 11.95
Median: 3.87
Q1: 1.19
Min: -11.84

MAR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.87 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PHM

41.50

Household Durables Industry

Max: 140.40
Q3: 77.14
Median: 24.53
Q1: 5.69
Min: -17.01

PHM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 41.50 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MAR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	PHM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.49	4.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.45	0.42
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	76.12	0.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	5.87	41.50

Growth

Revenue Growth

MAR vs. PHM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MAR vs. PHM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MAR

0.99%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 5.88%
Q3: 2.37%
Median: 0.68%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MAR’s Dividend Yield of 0.99% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PHM

0.70%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 8.95%
Q3: 4.19%
Median: 1.88%
Q1: 0.03%
Min: 0.00%

PHM’s Dividend Yield of 0.70% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MAR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MAR

28.74%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 127.31%
Q3: 56.79%
Median: 19.58%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MAR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.74% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PHM

6.30%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 125.12%
Q3: 62.43%
Median: 39.18%
Q1: 5.55%
Min: 0.00%

PHM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.30% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MAR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	PHM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.99%	0.70%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	28.74%	6.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MAR

29.17

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 59.44
Q3: 33.98
Median: 22.25
Q1: 15.53
Min: 7.61

MAR’s P/E Ratio of 29.17 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PHM

9.03

Household Durables Industry

Max: 29.75
Q3: 18.88
Median: 13.25
Q1: 9.26
Min: 6.32

In the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, PHM’s P/E Ratio of 9.03 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MAR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MAR

2.80

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 7.74
Q3: 3.88
Median: 2.05
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.17

MAR’s P/S Ratio of 2.80 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PHM

1.40

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.12
Q3: 1.21
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.51
Min: 0.18

PHM’s P/S Ratio of 1.40 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MAR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MAR

366.34

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 20.90
Q3: 9.78
Median: 4.29
Q1: 2.22
Min: 0.47

At 366.34, MAR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PHM

1.68

Household Durables Industry

Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.29
Median: 1.34
Q1: 0.98
Min: 0.59

PHM’s P/B Ratio of 1.68 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MAR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	PHM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	29.17	9.03
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.80	1.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	366.34	1.68
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	42.18	18.78