MAR vs. NCLH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 12, 2025

Here’s a clear look at MAR and NCLH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	MAR	NCLH
Company Name	Marriott International, Inc.	Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization	72.75 billion USD	10.78 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	March 23, 1998	January 18, 2013
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MAR and NCLH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MAR vs. NCLH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	NCLH
5-Day Price Return	0.59%	-3.62%
13-Week Price Return	-4.02%	7.83%
26-Week Price Return	19.30%	45.19%
52-Week Price Return	5.02%	17.87%
Month-to-Date Return	2.90%	-3.86%
Year-to-Date Return	-3.93%	-7.97%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.56M	12.05M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.42M	15.02M
3-Month Volatility	22.12%	39.61%
Beta	1.19	2.11

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MAR

309.12%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 84.03%
Q3: 40.12%
Median: 17.38%
Q1: 7.45%
Min: -33.94%

MAR’s Return on Equity of 309.12% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

NCLH

51.86%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 84.03%
Q3: 40.12%
Median: 17.38%
Q1: 7.45%
Min: -33.94%

In the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, NCLH’s Return on Equity of 51.86% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MAR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MAR

9.60%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 25.61%
Q3: 14.65%
Median: 8.66%
Q1: 3.36%
Min: -9.83%

MAR’s Net Profit Margin of 9.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NCLH

7.52%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 25.61%
Q3: 14.65%
Median: 8.66%
Q1: 3.36%
Min: -9.83%

NCLH’s Net Profit Margin of 7.52% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MAR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MAR

15.10%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 45.80%
Q3: 22.44%
Median: 14.98%
Q1: 6.59%
Min: -15.28%

MAR’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.10% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NCLH

14.77%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 45.80%
Q3: 22.44%
Median: 14.98%
Q1: 6.59%
Min: -15.28%

NCLH’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.77% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MAR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	NCLH
Return on Equity (TTM)	309.12%	51.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)	9.28%	3.48%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	9.60%	7.52%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	15.10%	14.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	20.24%	41.35%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MAR

0.49

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 2.73
Q3: 1.63
Median: 1.12
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.18

MAR’s Current Ratio of 0.49 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

NCLH

0.18

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 2.73
Q3: 1.63
Median: 1.12
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.18

NCLH’s Current Ratio of 0.18 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MAR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MAR

76.12

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 11.29
Q3: 4.71
Median: 1.65
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 76.12, MAR operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

NCLH

8.77

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 11.29
Q3: 4.71
Median: 1.65
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

NCLH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.77. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MAR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MAR

5.87

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 21.72
Q3: 11.40
Median: 4.02
Q1: 1.19
Min: -11.84

MAR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.87 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NCLH

2.16

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 21.72
Q3: 11.40
Median: 4.02
Q1: 1.19
Min: -11.84

NCLH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.16 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MAR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	NCLH
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.49	0.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.45	0.07
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	76.12	8.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	5.87	2.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

MAR vs. NCLH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MAR vs. NCLH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MAR

0.99%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 6.81%
Q3: 2.73%
Median: 0.74%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MAR’s Dividend Yield of 0.99% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NCLH

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 6.81%
Q3: 2.73%
Median: 0.74%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

NCLH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MAR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MAR

28.74%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 128.39%
Q3: 61.60%
Median: 21.91%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MAR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.74% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NCLH

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 128.39%
Q3: 61.60%
Median: 21.91%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

NCLH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MAR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	NCLH
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.99%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	28.74%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MAR

29.16

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 56.96
Q3: 33.82
Median: 21.30
Q1: 15.75
Min: 6.06

MAR’s P/E Ratio of 29.16 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NCLH

14.89

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 56.96
Q3: 33.82
Median: 21.30
Q1: 15.75
Min: 6.06

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, NCLH’s P/E Ratio of 14.89 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MAR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MAR

2.80

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 7.19
Q3: 3.99
Median: 1.93
Q1: 1.26
Min: 0.17

MAR’s P/S Ratio of 2.80 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NCLH

1.12

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 7.19
Q3: 3.99
Median: 1.93
Q1: 1.26
Min: 0.17

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, NCLH’s P/S Ratio of 1.12 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MAR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MAR

366.34

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 24.89
Q3: 11.60
Median: 4.91
Q1: 2.29
Min: 0.37

At 366.34, MAR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NCLH

5.77

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 24.89
Q3: 11.60
Median: 4.91
Q1: 2.29
Min: 0.37

NCLH’s P/B Ratio of 5.77 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MAR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	NCLH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	29.16	14.89
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.80	1.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	366.34	5.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	42.16	19.94