MAR vs. MBLY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 27, 2025

Here’s a clear look at MAR and MBLY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	MAR	MBLY
Company Name	Marriott International, Inc.	Mobileye Global Inc.
Country	United States	Israel
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure	Automobile Components
Market Capitalization	72.91 billion USD	11.24 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	March 23, 1998	October 26, 2022
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MAR and MBLY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MAR vs. MBLY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	MBLY
5-Day Price Return	0.68%	-0.58%
13-Week Price Return	3.03%	-13.63%
26-Week Price Return	-6.59%	-23.83%
52-Week Price Return	19.85%	-8.90%
Month-to-Date Return	1.81%	-3.02%
Year-to-Date Return	-3.71%	-30.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.15M	3.70M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.53M	5.38M
3-Month Volatility	22.52%	51.23%
Beta	1.38	0.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MAR

309.12%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 83.01%
Q3: 39.51%
Median: 17.38%
Q1: 5.32%
Min: -45.92%

MAR’s Return on Equity of 309.12% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MBLY

-24.48%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 22.61%
Q3: 12.61%
Median: 8.05%
Q1: 4.99%
Min: -4.24%

MBLY has a negative Return on Equity of -24.48%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MAR vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MAR

9.60%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 26.45%
Q3: 14.67%
Median: 8.69%
Q1: 3.34%
Min: -11.30%

MAR’s Net Profit Margin of 9.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MBLY

-153.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 14.35%
Q3: 7.20%
Median: 5.37%
Q1: 2.20%
Min: -3.89%

MBLY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -153.91%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MAR vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MAR

15.10%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 38.76%
Q3: 21.15%
Median: 14.20%
Q1: 6.43%
Min: -14.56%

MAR’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.10% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MBLY

-160.62%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 18.98%
Q3: 10.24%
Median: 7.27%
Q1: 4.13%
Min: 0.23%

MBLY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -160.62%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MAR vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	MBLY
Return on Equity (TTM)	309.12%	-24.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)	9.28%	-23.52%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	9.60%	-153.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	15.10%	-160.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	20.24%	48.80%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MAR

0.49

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 2.68
Q3: 1.62
Median: 1.11
Q1: 0.74
Min: 0.19

MAR’s Current Ratio of 0.49 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MBLY

6.91

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 4.06
Q3: 2.51
Median: 1.80
Q1: 1.47
Min: 0.79

MBLY’s Current Ratio of 6.91 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MAR vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MAR

76.12

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 9.88
Q3: 4.54
Median: 1.52
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 76.12, MAR operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MBLY

0.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 1.25
Q3: 0.63
Median: 0.37
Q1: 0.18
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MBLY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MAR vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MAR

5.87

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 26.88
Q3: 11.95
Median: 3.87
Q1: 1.19
Min: -11.84

MAR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.87 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MBLY

-4.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 88.53
Q3: 38.84
Median: 11.36
Q1: 5.08
Min: -21.51

MBLY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.33. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MAR vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	MBLY
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.49	6.91
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.45	5.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	76.12	0.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	5.87	-4.33

Growth

Revenue Growth

MAR vs. MBLY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MAR vs. MBLY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MAR

0.98%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 5.88%
Q3: 2.37%
Median: 0.68%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MAR’s Dividend Yield of 0.98% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 6.03%
Q3: 3.38%
Median: 2.62%
Q1: 1.38%
Min: 0.00%

MBLY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MAR vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MAR

28.74%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 127.31%
Q3: 56.79%
Median: 19.58%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MAR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.74% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 95.56%
Q3: 55.95%
Median: 37.10%
Q1: 27.90%
Min: 0.00%

MBLY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MAR vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	MBLY
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.98%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	28.74%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MAR

29.47

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 59.44
Q3: 33.98
Median: 22.25
Q1: 15.53
Min: 7.61

MAR’s P/E Ratio of 29.47 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MBLY

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 26.62
Q3: 17.42
Median: 13.22
Q1: 11.14
Min: 2.52

P/E Ratio data for MBLY is currently unavailable.

MAR vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MAR

2.83

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 7.74
Q3: 3.88
Median: 2.05
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.17

MAR’s P/S Ratio of 2.83 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MBLY

5.93

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 1.81
Q3: 0.97
Median: 0.71
Q1: 0.38
Min: 0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 5.93, MBLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobile Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MAR vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MAR

366.34

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 20.90
Q3: 9.78
Median: 4.29
Q1: 2.22
Min: 0.47

At 366.34, MAR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MBLY

1.21

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 2.49
Q3: 1.49
Median: 0.93
Q1: 0.78
Min: 0.40

MBLY’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MAR vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	MAR	MBLY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	29.47	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.83	5.93
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	366.34	1.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	42.62	19.33