Seek Returns logo

MANH vs. QXO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MANH and QXO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMANHQXO
Company NameManhattan Associates, Inc.QXO, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySoftwareTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization13.31 billion USD14.12 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateApril 23, 1998April 17, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MANH and QXO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MANH vs. QXO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMANHQXO
5-Day Price Return4.22%8.67%
13-Week Price Return12.34%45.74%
26-Week Price Return11.17%55.42%
52-Week Price Return-10.88%95.72%
Month-to-Date Return0.24%4.99%
Year-to-Date Return-18.52%32.45%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.51M6.16M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.77M8.00M
3-Month Volatility31.46%57.56%
Beta1.142.19

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MANH

80.35%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

MANH’s Return on Equity of 80.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Software industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

QXO

0.91%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.33%
Q3
19.92%
Median
14.05%
Q1
11.46%
Min
0.91%

QXO’s Return on Equity of 0.91% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

MANH vs. QXO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MANH

20.91%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.91% places MANH in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

QXO

65.39%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
17.73%
Q3
10.81%
Median
6.13%
Q1
4.33%
Min
2.09%

QXO’s Net Profit Margin of 65.39% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MANH vs. QXO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MANH

25.79%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.79% places MANH in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

QXO

-197.54%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.50%
Q3
15.13%
Median
7.46%
Q1
5.44%
Min
3.55%

QXO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -197.54%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MANH vs. QXO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMANHQXO
Return on Equity (TTM)80.35%0.91%
Return on Assets (TTM)30.41%0.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.91%65.39%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.79%-197.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.28%40.51%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MANH

1.19

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

MANH’s Current Ratio of 1.19 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

QXO

95.23

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.60
Q1
1.43
Min
0.46

QXO’s Current Ratio of 95.23 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MANH vs. QXO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MANH

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

MANH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

QXO

0.00

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, QXO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MANH vs. QXO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MANH

35.00

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

MANH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 35.00 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

QXO

-23.41

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.75
Q1
2.70
Min
-1.67

QXO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -23.41. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MANH vs. QXO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMANHQXO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.1995.23
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.1195.16
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)35.00-23.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

MANH vs. QXO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MANH vs. QXO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MANH

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MANH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

QXO

0.51%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
3.04%
Median
1.94%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

QXO’s Dividend Yield of 0.51% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MANH vs. QXO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MANH

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MANH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

QXO

0.00%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
95.14%
Q3
62.08%
Median
51.17%
Q1
26.24%
Min
0.00%

QXO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MANH vs. QXO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMANHQXO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.51%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MANH

58.51

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

MANH’s P/E Ratio of 58.51 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

QXO

388.26

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
48.55
Q3
26.73
Median
17.17
Q1
10.78
Min
1.62

At 388.26, QXO’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MANH vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MANH

12.23

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

MANH’s P/S Ratio of 12.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

QXO

253.89

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.56
Median
1.02
Q1
0.60
Min
0.29

With a P/S Ratio of 253.89, QXO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MANH vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MANH

43.01

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

At 43.01, MANH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

QXO

1.10

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
8.77
Q3
4.33
Median
2.00
Q1
1.11
Min
0.35

QXO’s P/B Ratio of 1.10 is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MANH vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMANHQXO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)58.51388.26
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)12.23253.89
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)43.011.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)42.11117.17