Seek Returns logo

MAA vs. WY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MAA and WY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both MAA and WY are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolMAAWY
Company NameMid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.Weyerhaeuser Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryResidential REITsSpecialized REITs
Market Capitalization16.75 billion USD18.00 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 28, 1994May 3, 1973
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MAA and WY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MAA vs. WY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMAAWY
5-Day Price Return-0.50%0.73%
13-Week Price Return-5.59%-3.50%
26-Week Price Return-15.06%-15.74%
52-Week Price Return-11.43%-26.55%
Month-to-Date Return-4.18%-4.17%
Year-to-Date Return-9.60%-11.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.86M5.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.90M4.47M
3-Month Volatility19.28%28.46%
Beta0.801.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MAA

9.60%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
17.50%
Q3
9.60%
Median
6.78%
Q1
3.88%
Min
-0.69%

MAA’s Return on Equity of 9.60% is on par with the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WY

2.88%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
21.01%
Q3
17.78%
Median
8.42%
Q1
6.83%
Min
-1.71%

WY’s Return on Equity of 2.88% is in the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

MAA vs. WY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MAA

25.98%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
53.28%
Q3
43.51%
Median
25.98%
Q1
9.99%
Min
-0.30%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

WY

3.97%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
70.20%
Q3
38.00%
Median
23.98%
Q1
6.53%
Min
-1.41%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

MAA vs. WY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MAA

29.76%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
54.66%
Q3
47.76%
Median
29.76%
Q1
18.99%
Min
-0.66%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

WY

8.19%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
54.03%
Median
42.12%
Q1
16.28%
Min
5.86%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

MAA vs. WY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMAAWY
Return on Equity (TTM)9.60%2.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.84%1.69%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.98%3.97%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.76%8.19%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)58.85%17.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MAA

0.13

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.58
Q3
0.84
Median
0.56
Q1
0.10
Min
0.00

MAA’s Current Ratio of 0.13 aligns with the median group of the Residential REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WY

1.04

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.08
Median
0.58
Q1
0.34
Min
0.10

WY’s Current Ratio of 1.04 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MAA vs. WY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MAA

0.85

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.10
Median
0.83
Q1
0.68
Min
0.28

MAA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.85 is typical for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WY

0.54

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.86
Q3
3.80
Median
1.22
Q1
0.73
Min
0.16

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, WY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MAA vs. WY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MAA

4.01

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.01
Median
2.53
Q1
1.52
Min
0.52

MAA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.01 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WY

2.99

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
3.92
Median
2.94
Q1
2.07
Min
1.14

WY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.99 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MAA vs. WY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMAAWY
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.131.04
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.050.57
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.850.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.012.99

Growth

Revenue Growth

MAA vs. WY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MAA vs. WY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MAA

4.29%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.67%
Q3
4.30%
Median
3.71%
Q1
3.53%
Min
3.04%

MAA’s Dividend Yield of 4.29% is consistent with its peers in the Residential REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WY

3.32%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
6.92%
Q3
5.29%
Median
4.71%
Q1
3.25%
Min
2.16%

WY’s Dividend Yield of 3.32% is consistent with its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MAA vs. WY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MAA

122.73%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
214.13%
Q3
138.72%
Median
103.63%
Q1
84.15%
Min
22.05%

MAA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 122.73% is within the typical range for the Residential REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WY

212.90%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
338.69%
Q3
202.75%
Median
125.21%
Q1
107.89%
Min
16.73%

WY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 212.90% is in the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MAA vs. WY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMAAWY
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.29%3.32%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)122.73%212.90%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MAA

28.62

Residential REITs Industry

Max
76.72
Q3
44.45
Median
28.89
Q1
22.94
Min
9.90

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

WY

64.11

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
119.95
Q3
64.19
Median
27.78
Q1
23.88
Min
5.25

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

MAA vs. WY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MAA

7.44

Residential REITs Industry

Max
13.08
Q3
9.23
Median
7.38
Q1
6.12
Min
5.65

MAA’s P/S Ratio of 7.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WY

2.54

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
10.35
Q3
8.84
Median
8.28
Q1
5.39
Min
1.68

In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, WY’s P/S Ratio of 2.54 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MAA vs. WY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MAA

2.93

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.07
Q3
2.62
Median
2.08
Q1
1.46
Min
0.68

MAA’s P/B Ratio of 2.93 is in the upper tier for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

WY

1.96

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
13.73
Q3
7.48
Median
2.56
Q1
1.70
Min
0.71

WY’s P/B Ratio of 1.96 is within the conventional range for the Specialized REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MAA vs. WY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMAAWY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.6264.11
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.442.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.931.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)69.7736.13