Seek Returns logo

MAA vs. SUI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MAA and SUI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both MAA and SUI are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolMAASUI
Company NameMid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.Sun Communities, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryResidential REITsResidential REITs
Market Capitalization17.05 billion USD16.45 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 28, 1994December 9, 1993
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MAA and SUI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MAA vs. SUI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMAASUI
5-Day Price Return-0.26%-0.64%
13-Week Price Return-8.02%6.03%
26-Week Price Return-9.80%0.92%
52-Week Price Return-7.90%-4.63%
Month-to-Date Return-0.28%1.72%
Year-to-Date Return-8.11%2.59%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.89M0.77M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.92M0.91M
3-Month Volatility18.38%21.11%
Beta0.800.86

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MAA

9.60%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
12.21%
Q3
9.45%
Median
7.42%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.37%

In the upper quartile for the Residential REITs industry, MAA’s Return on Equity of 9.60% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SUI

17.50%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
12.21%
Q3
9.45%
Median
7.42%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.37%

SUI’s Return on Equity of 17.50% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MAA vs. SUI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MAA

25.98%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
67.49%
Q3
38.86%
Median
25.74%
Q1
7.62%
Min
0.15%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

SUI

47.05%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
67.49%
Q3
38.86%
Median
25.74%
Q1
7.62%
Min
0.15%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

MAA vs. SUI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MAA

29.76%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
54.06%
Q3
45.82%
Median
29.89%
Q1
19.34%
Min
5.28%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

SUI

-0.66%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
54.06%
Q3
45.82%
Median
29.89%
Q1
19.34%
Min
5.28%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

MAA vs. SUI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMAASUI
Return on Equity (TTM)9.60%17.50%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.84%8.24%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.98%47.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.76%-0.66%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)58.85%49.70%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MAA

0.13

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.28
Q3
0.64
Median
0.21
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

MAA’s Current Ratio of 0.13 aligns with the median group of the Residential REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SUI

4.21

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.28
Q3
0.64
Median
0.21
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

SUI’s Current Ratio of 4.21 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MAA vs. SUI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MAA

0.85

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.62
Q3
1.10
Median
0.83
Q1
0.69
Min
0.28

MAA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.85 is typical for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SUI

0.56

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.62
Q3
1.10
Median
0.83
Q1
0.69
Min
0.28

Falling into the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry, SUI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MAA vs. SUI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MAA

4.01

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.01
Median
2.53
Q1
1.52
Min
0.52

MAA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.01 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SUI

1.17

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.01
Median
2.53
Q1
1.52
Min
0.52

In the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry, SUI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.17 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MAA vs. SUI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMAASUI
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.134.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.053.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.850.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.011.17

Growth

Revenue Growth

MAA vs. SUI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MAA vs. SUI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MAA

4.21%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.21%
Q3
3.83%
Median
3.40%
Q1
3.27%
Min
2.80%

MAA’s Dividend Yield of 4.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

SUI

6.43%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.21%
Q3
3.83%
Median
3.40%
Q1
3.27%
Min
2.80%

SUI’s Dividend Yield of 6.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

MAA vs. SUI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MAA

122.73%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
210.87%
Q3
145.45%
Median
102.94%
Q1
84.58%
Min
17.15%

MAA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 122.73% is within the typical range for the Residential REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SUI

49.16%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
210.87%
Q3
145.45%
Median
102.94%
Q1
84.58%
Min
17.15%

SUI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.16% is in the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MAA vs. SUI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMAASUI
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.21%6.43%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)122.73%49.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MAA

29.16

Residential REITs Industry

Max
177.01
Q3
109.22
Median
31.26
Q1
25.84
Min
8.46

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

SUI

12.15

Residential REITs Industry

Max
177.01
Q3
109.22
Median
31.26
Q1
25.84
Min
8.46

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

MAA vs. SUI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MAA

7.58

Residential REITs Industry

Max
12.50
Q3
10.33
Median
8.01
Q1
6.55
Min
5.06

MAA’s P/S Ratio of 7.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SUI

5.72

Residential REITs Industry

Max
12.50
Q3
10.33
Median
8.01
Q1
6.55
Min
5.06

In the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry, SUI’s P/S Ratio of 5.72 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MAA vs. SUI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MAA

2.93

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.83
Median
2.20
Q1
1.42
Min
0.67

MAA’s P/B Ratio of 2.93 is in the upper tier for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SUI

2.11

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.83
Median
2.20
Q1
1.42
Min
0.67

SUI’s P/B Ratio of 2.11 is within the conventional range for the Residential REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MAA vs. SUI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Residential REITs industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMAASUI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.1612.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.585.72
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.932.11
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)71.1020.18