Seek Returns logo

MA vs. TSLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MA and TSLA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMATSLA
Company NameMastercard IncorporatedTesla, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesAutomobiles
Market Capitalization535.79 billion USD1,044.72 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 25, 2006June 29, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MA and TSLA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MA vs. TSLA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMATSLA
5-Day Price Return1.53%-3.48%
13-Week Price Return1.07%-5.32%
26-Week Price Return4.66%-9.00%
52-Week Price Return26.92%45.43%
Month-to-Date Return4.63%5.07%
Year-to-Date Return12.55%-19.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.49M77.14M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.71M104.32M
3-Month Volatility21.60%55.64%
Beta0.992.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MA

191.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

MA’s Return on Equity of 191.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TSLA

8.22%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

TSLA’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MA

44.93%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

A Net Profit Margin of 44.93% places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TSLA

6.54%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.54% places TSLA in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MA

55.78%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 55.78% places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TSLA

6.06%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

TSLA’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.06% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMATSLA
Return on Equity (TTM)191.02%8.22%
Return on Assets (TTM)27.84%4.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)44.93%6.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)55.78%6.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--17.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MA

1.16

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

TSLA

2.04

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

TSLA’s Current Ratio of 2.04 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MA

2.42

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

TSLA

0.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, TSLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MA

37.93

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

TSLA

71.48

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

TSLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 71.48 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMATSLA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.162.04
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.161.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.420.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)37.9371.48

Growth

Revenue Growth

MA vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MA vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MA

0.49%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MA’s Dividend Yield of 0.49% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSLA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MA

19.15%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.15% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

TSLA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMATSLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.49%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.15%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MA

39.22

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

A P/E Ratio of 39.22 places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TSLA

172.34

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

At 172.34, TSLA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MA

17.62

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

TSLA

11.27

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 11.27, TSLA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MA

64.98

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

At 64.98, MA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TSLA

13.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 13.23, TSLA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMATSLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)39.22172.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)17.6211.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)64.9813.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.58187.03