Seek Returns logo

MA vs. TMUS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MA and TMUS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMATMUS
Company NameMastercard IncorporatedT-Mobile US, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsCommunication Services
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesWireless Telecommunication Services
Market Capitalization536.27 billion USD283.31 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 25, 2006April 19, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MA and TMUS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MA vs. TMUS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMATMUS
5-Day Price Return1.32%-2.51%
13-Week Price Return4.05%4.53%
26-Week Price Return4.35%-4.41%
52-Week Price Return26.53%28.15%
Month-to-Date Return4.72%5.59%
Year-to-Date Return12.66%14.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.36M3.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.68M4.42M
3-Month Volatility21.33%23.82%
Beta0.990.61

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MA

191.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

MA’s Return on Equity of 191.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TMUS

19.69%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
27.67%
Q3
18.94%
Median
13.35%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-8.07%

In the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, TMUS’s Return on Equity of 19.69% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MA vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MA

44.93%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

A Net Profit Margin of 44.93% places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TMUS

14.53%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
17.18%
Q3
13.67%
Median
9.33%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-5.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.53% places TMUS in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MA vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MA

55.78%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 55.78% places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TMUS

23.08%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
29.85%
Q3
23.51%
Median
20.46%
Q1
16.06%
Min
9.07%

TMUS’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.08% is around the midpoint for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MA vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMATMUS
Return on Equity (TTM)191.02%19.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)27.84%5.78%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)44.93%14.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)55.78%23.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--63.61%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MA

1.16

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

TMUS

1.21

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.26
Q3
1.00
Median
0.71
Q1
0.60
Min
0.36

TMUS’s Current Ratio of 1.21 is in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MA vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MA

2.42

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

TMUS

1.45

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.57
Q1
0.91
Min
0.44

TMUS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.45 is typical for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MA vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MA

37.93

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

TMUS

5.31

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
12.67
Q3
6.16
Median
3.95
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.20

TMUS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MA vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMATMUS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.161.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.161.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.421.45
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)37.935.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

MA vs. TMUS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MA vs. TMUS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MA

0.49%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MA’s Dividend Yield of 0.49% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TMUS

1.29%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
7.63%
Q3
5.13%
Median
3.22%
Q1
2.33%
Min
0.00%

TMUS’s Dividend Yield of 1.29% is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MA vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MA

19.15%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.15% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TMUS

30.87%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
145.86%
Q3
109.87%
Median
78.85%
Q1
48.65%
Min
0.00%

TMUS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.87% is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MA vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMATMUS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.49%1.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.15%30.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MA

39.22

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

A P/E Ratio of 39.22 places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TMUS

23.93

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
34.45
Q3
23.52
Median
16.68
Q1
13.97
Min
7.48

A P/E Ratio of 23.93 places TMUS in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MA vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MA

17.62

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

TMUS

3.48

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.94
Median
1.37
Q1
1.22
Min
0.62

With a P/S Ratio of 3.48, TMUS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MA vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MA

64.98

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

At 64.98, MA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TMUS

4.43

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.93
Median
2.02
Q1
1.33
Min
0.40

TMUS’s P/B Ratio of 4.43 is in the upper tier for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MA vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMATMUS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)39.2223.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)17.623.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)64.984.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.5823.69