Seek Returns logo

MA vs. PG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MA and PG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMAPG
Company NameMastercard IncorporatedThe Procter & Gamble Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesHousehold Products
Market Capitalization490.65 billion USD340.77 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 25, 2006January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MA and PG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MA vs. PG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMAPG
5-Day Price Return-1.31%1.49%
13-Week Price Return-6.18%-4.33%
26-Week Price Return-5.35%-6.97%
52-Week Price Return4.57%-11.35%
Month-to-Date Return-1.13%-1.80%
Year-to-Date Return3.64%-11.92%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.33M9.01M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.61M7.52M
3-Month Volatility16.40%14.43%
Beta0.870.39

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MA

197.14%

Financial Services Industry

Max
34.42%
Q3
16.76%
Median
9.18%
Q1
3.90%
Min
-10.16%

MA’s Return on Equity of 197.14% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PG

32.09%

Household Products Industry

Max
173.33%
Q3
128.99%
Median
18.47%
Q1
9.92%
Min
-6.34%

PG’s Return on Equity of 32.09% is on par with the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MA vs. PG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MA

45.28%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.33%
Median
13.11%
Q1
7.04%
Min
-8.99%

A Net Profit Margin of 45.28% places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PG

19.74%

Household Products Industry

Max
14.68%
Q3
12.48%
Median
9.30%
Q1
8.70%
Min
5.05%

PG’s Net Profit Margin of 19.74% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MA vs. PG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MA

56.95%

Financial Services Industry

Max
81.07%
Q3
40.32%
Median
19.93%
Q1
10.20%
Min
-34.40%

An Operating Profit Margin of 56.95% places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PG

24.13%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.46%
Q3
16.57%
Median
14.01%
Q1
12.86%
Min
12.78%

PG’s Operating Profit Margin of 24.13% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

MA vs. PG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMAPG
Return on Equity (TTM)197.14%32.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)28.32%13.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)45.28%19.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)56.95%24.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--51.23%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MA

1.12

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.26
Median
1.33
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PG

0.71

Household Products Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.98
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.50

PG’s Current Ratio of 0.71 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MA vs. PG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MA

2.40

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.55
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

PG

0.67

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

PG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Household Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MA vs. PG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MA

37.93

Financial Services Industry

Max
140.54
Q3
57.67
Median
6.72
Q1
1.93
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

PG

47.04

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
17.34
Q1
9.99
Min
5.60

PG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 47.04 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MA vs. PG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMAPG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.120.71
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.120.46
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.400.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)37.9347.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

MA vs. PG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MA vs. PG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MA

0.55%

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.52%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.75%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MA’s Dividend Yield of 0.55% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PG

2.93%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.56%
Q3
3.53%
Median
3.05%
Q1
2.11%
Min
1.42%

PG’s Dividend Yield of 2.93% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MA vs. PG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MA

18.79%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
17.51%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.79% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PG

59.51%

Household Products Industry

Max
189.95%
Q3
111.93%
Median
74.93%
Q1
56.30%
Min
30.76%

PG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.51% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MA vs. PG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMAPG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.55%2.93%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.79%59.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MA

34.39

Financial Services Industry

Max
46.13
Q3
28.79
Median
13.18
Q1
9.14
Min
0.47

A P/E Ratio of 34.39 places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PG

20.34

Household Products Industry

Max
31.74
Q3
25.68
Median
20.54
Q1
14.94
Min
14.20

PG’s P/E Ratio of 20.34 is within the middle range for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MA vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MA

15.57

Financial Services Industry

Max
9.71
Q3
4.81
Median
2.49
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

PG

4.01

Household Products Industry

Max
4.24
Q3
2.79
Median
1.94
Q1
1.34
Min
1.04

PG’s P/S Ratio of 4.01 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MA vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MA

65.06

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.21
Q3
3.51
Median
1.52
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

At 65.06, MA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PG

6.75

Household Products Industry

Max
46.10
Q3
20.24
Median
5.19
Q1
2.28
Min
1.41

PG’s P/B Ratio of 6.75 is within the conventional range for the Household Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MA vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMAPG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.3920.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)15.574.01
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)65.066.75
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.0622.81