Seek Returns logo

LYV vs. TMUS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LYV and TMUS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLYVTMUS
Company NameLive Nation Entertainment, Inc.T-Mobile US, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesCommunication Services
GICS IndustryEntertainmentWireless Telecommunication Services
Market Capitalization37.55 billion USD291.50 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 21, 2005April 19, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LYV and TMUS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LYV vs. TMUS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLYVTMUS
5-Day Price Return0.19%3.48%
13-Week Price Return9.17%6.04%
26-Week Price Return6.11%-2.29%
52-Week Price Return67.72%31.09%
Month-to-Date Return9.61%8.64%
Year-to-Date Return25.02%17.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.63M3.78M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.46M4.42M
3-Month Volatility24.44%23.46%
Beta1.420.61

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LYV

396.60%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

LYV’s Return on Equity of 396.60% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TMUS

19.69%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
27.67%
Q3
18.94%
Median
13.35%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-8.07%

In the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, TMUS’s Return on Equity of 19.69% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LYV vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LYV

3.88%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, LYV’s Net Profit Margin of 3.88% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TMUS

14.53%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
17.18%
Q3
13.67%
Median
9.33%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-5.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.53% places TMUS in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LYV vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LYV

4.21%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

LYV’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.21% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TMUS

23.08%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
29.85%
Q3
23.51%
Median
20.46%
Q1
16.06%
Min
9.07%

TMUS’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.08% is around the midpoint for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LYV vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLYVTMUS
Return on Equity (TTM)396.60%19.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.36%5.78%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.88%14.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.21%23.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.24%63.61%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LYV

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

LYV’s Current Ratio of 0.88 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TMUS

1.21

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.26
Q3
1.00
Median
0.71
Q1
0.60
Min
0.36

TMUS’s Current Ratio of 1.21 is in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LYV vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LYV

17.99

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 17.99, LYV operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TMUS

1.45

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.57
Q1
0.91
Min
0.44

TMUS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.45 is typical for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LYV vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LYV

4.97

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

LYV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TMUS

5.31

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
12.67
Q3
6.16
Median
3.95
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.20

TMUS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LYV vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLYVTMUS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.881.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.741.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)17.991.45
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.975.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

LYV vs. TMUS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LYV vs. TMUS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LYV

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LYV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TMUS

1.29%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
7.63%
Q3
5.13%
Median
3.22%
Q1
2.33%
Min
0.00%

TMUS’s Dividend Yield of 1.29% is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

LYV vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LYV

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LYV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TMUS

30.87%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
145.86%
Q3
109.87%
Median
78.85%
Q1
48.65%
Min
0.00%

TMUS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.87% is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

LYV vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLYVTMUS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%30.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LYV

41.09

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

LYV’s P/E Ratio of 41.09 is within the middle range for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TMUS

23.93

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
34.45
Q3
23.52
Median
16.68
Q1
13.97
Min
7.48

A P/E Ratio of 23.93 places TMUS in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LYV vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LYV

1.59

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, LYV’s P/S Ratio of 1.59 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TMUS

3.48

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.94
Median
1.37
Q1
1.22
Min
0.62

With a P/S Ratio of 3.48, TMUS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LYV vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LYV

97.21

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

At 97.21, LYV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TMUS

4.43

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.93
Median
2.02
Q1
1.33
Min
0.40

TMUS’s P/B Ratio of 4.43 is in the upper tier for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LYV vs. TMUS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLYVTMUS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)41.0923.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.593.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)97.214.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.8823.69