Seek Returns logo

LYV vs. MSGS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LYV and MSGS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLYVMSGS
Company NameLive Nation Entertainment, Inc.Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesCommunication Services
GICS IndustryEntertainmentEntertainment
Market Capitalization37.53 billion USD5.44 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 21, 2005September 17, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LYV and MSGS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LYV vs. MSGS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLYVMSGS
5-Day Price Return0.81%3.55%
13-Week Price Return8.01%12.09%
26-Week Price Return28.92%15.65%
52-Week Price Return50.27%10.34%
Month-to-Date Return-1.86%1.23%
Year-to-Date Return26.18%1.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.02M0.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.52M0.20M
3-Month Volatility22.04%21.43%
Beta1.390.64

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LYV

396.60%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
24.06%
Median
13.69%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-17.95%

LYV’s Return on Equity of 396.60% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MSGS

-6.84%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
24.06%
Median
13.69%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-17.95%

MSGS has a negative Return on Equity of -6.84%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

LYV vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LYV

3.88%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
24.40%
Median
13.94%
Q1
4.28%
Min
-23.67%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, LYV’s Net Profit Margin of 3.88% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MSGS

-2.16%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
24.40%
Median
13.94%
Q1
4.28%
Min
-23.67%

MSGS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.16%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

LYV vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LYV

4.21%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.77%
Q3
28.26%
Median
16.13%
Q1
8.03%
Min
-3.93%

LYV’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.21% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MSGS

1.42%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.77%
Q3
28.26%
Median
16.13%
Q1
8.03%
Min
-3.93%

MSGS’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.42% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LYV vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLYVMSGS
Return on Equity (TTM)396.60%-6.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.36%-1.56%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.88%-2.16%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.21%1.42%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.24%33.84%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LYV

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.02
Median
1.55
Q1
0.86
Min
0.38

LYV’s Current Ratio of 0.88 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MSGS

0.45

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.02
Median
1.55
Q1
0.86
Min
0.38

MSGS’s Current Ratio of 0.45 falls into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LYV vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LYV

17.99

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.77
Median
0.16
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 17.99, LYV operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MSGS

0.15

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.77
Median
0.16
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

MSGS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LYV vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LYV

4.97

Entertainment Industry

Max
87.17
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

LYV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MSGS

0.29

Entertainment Industry

Max
87.17
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

MSGS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.29 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

LYV vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLYVMSGS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.880.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.740.37
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)17.990.15
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.970.29

Growth

Revenue Growth

LYV vs. MSGS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LYV vs. MSGS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LYV

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.90%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LYV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MSGS

0.01%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.90%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSGS’s Dividend Yield of 0.01% is consistent with its peers in the Entertainment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LYV vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LYV

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
38.45%
Median
29.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LYV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MSGS

0.33%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
38.45%
Median
29.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSGS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.33% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LYV vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLYVMSGS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.01%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.33%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LYV

40.10

Entertainment Industry

Max
92.09
Q3
54.51
Median
28.92
Q1
19.75
Min
2.96

LYV’s P/E Ratio of 40.10 is within the middle range for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MSGS

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
92.09
Q3
54.51
Median
28.92
Q1
19.75
Min
2.96

P/E Ratio data for MSGS is currently unavailable.

LYV vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LYV

1.55

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.67
Median
5.06
Q1
2.72
Min
0.67

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, LYV’s P/S Ratio of 1.55 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MSGS

5.33

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.67
Median
5.06
Q1
2.72
Min
0.67

MSGS’s P/S Ratio of 5.33 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LYV vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LYV

97.21

Entertainment Industry

Max
22.84
Q3
10.54
Median
6.60
Q1
2.30
Min
0.65

At 97.21, LYV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MSGS

1.98

Entertainment Industry

Max
22.84
Q3
10.54
Median
6.60
Q1
2.30
Min
0.65

MSGS’s P/B Ratio of 1.98 is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LYV vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLYVMSGS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)40.10--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.555.33
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)97.211.98
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.4748.38