Seek Returns logo

LYB vs. SUZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LYB and SUZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LYB is a standard domestic listing, while SUZ trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolLYBSUZ
Company NameLyondellBasell Industries N.V.Suzano S.A.
CountryUnited StatesBrazil
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryChemicalsPaper & Forest Products
Market Capitalization18.10 billion USD12.11 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 28, 2010November 4, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LYB and SUZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LYB vs. SUZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLYBSUZ
5-Day Price Return1.46%0.23%
13-Week Price Return-2.92%2.53%
26-Week Price Return-26.87%-8.82%
52-Week Price Return-42.50%-6.74%
Month-to-Date Return-2.85%0.88%
Year-to-Date Return-24.22%-14.84%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.97M3.93M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.31M5.46M
3-Month Volatility47.98%23.69%
Beta0.930.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LYB

2.08%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

LYB’s Return on Equity of 2.08% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

SUZ

20.16%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
6.82%
Q3
5.52%
Median
4.14%
Q1
2.38%
Min
-1.81%

SUZ’s Return on Equity of 20.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LYB vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LYB

0.75%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, LYB’s Net Profit Margin of 0.75% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

SUZ

15.26%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
18.06%
Q3
11.46%
Median
3.39%
Q1
1.84%
Min
-2.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.26% places SUZ in the upper quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LYB vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LYB

1.52%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

LYB’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.52% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

SUZ

26.63%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
31.11%
Q3
16.36%
Median
6.08%
Q1
4.04%
Min
-2.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.63% places SUZ in the upper quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LYB vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLYBSUZ
Return on Equity (TTM)2.08%20.16%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.73%4.94%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.75%15.26%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.52%26.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)9.47%37.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LYB

1.77

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

LYB’s Current Ratio of 1.77 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SUZ

3.16

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
3.03
Q3
2.03
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.99

SUZ’s Current Ratio of 3.16 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

LYB vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LYB

0.99

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

LYB’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Chemicals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.99. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SUZ

2.28

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.82
Median
0.56
Q1
0.27
Min
0.05

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.28, SUZ operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Paper & Forest Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LYB vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LYB

3.85

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

LYB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.85 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SUZ

0.53

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
14.16
Median
7.41
Q1
2.72
Min
-0.13

SUZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.53 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

LYB vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLYBSUZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.773.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.922.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.992.28
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.850.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

LYB vs. SUZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LYB vs. SUZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LYB

10.12%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

LYB’s Dividend Yield of 10.12% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Chemicals industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

SUZ

3.79%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
6.30%
Q3
3.72%
Median
2.41%
Q1
1.71%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.79%, SUZ offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Paper & Forest Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LYB vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LYB

152.02%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

LYB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 152.02% is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SUZ

15.16%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
495.87%
Q3
219.88%
Median
83.21%
Q1
24.91%
Min
0.00%

SUZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.16% is in the lower quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

LYB vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLYBSUZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)10.12%3.79%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)152.02%15.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LYB

66.07

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

At 66.07, LYB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SUZ

8.48

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
36.56
Q3
23.55
Median
16.47
Q1
13.85
Min
5.22

In the lower quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry, SUZ’s P/E Ratio of 8.48 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LYB vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LYB

0.49

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, LYB’s P/S Ratio of 0.49 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SUZ

1.29

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
2.15
Q3
1.30
Median
0.80
Q1
0.63
Min
0.30

SUZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the market consensus for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LYB vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LYB

1.56

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

LYB’s P/B Ratio of 1.56 is within the conventional range for the Chemicals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SUZ

1.50

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
1.90
Q3
1.25
Median
0.87
Q1
0.73
Min
0.25

SUZ’s P/B Ratio of 1.50 is in the upper tier for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LYB vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLYBSUZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)66.078.48
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.491.29
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.561.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.7211.53