Seek Returns logo

LYB vs. MOS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LYB and MOS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLYBMOS
Company NameLyondellBasell Industries N.V.The Mosaic Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryChemicalsChemicals
Market Capitalization15.66 billion USD11.22 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 28, 2010January 26, 1988
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LYB and MOS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LYB vs. MOS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLYBMOS
5-Day Price Return-0.73%1.90%
13-Week Price Return-19.84%-6.24%
26-Week Price Return-30.50%31.87%
52-Week Price Return-48.69%31.91%
Month-to-Date Return-0.73%1.90%
Year-to-Date Return-34.46%43.78%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.57M4.32M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.65M4.93M
3-Month Volatility45.77%38.87%
Beta0.770.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LYB

2.08%

Chemicals Industry

Max
29.52%
Q3
13.18%
Median
6.53%
Q1
1.35%
Min
-11.86%

LYB’s Return on Equity of 2.08% is on par with the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MOS

7.92%

Chemicals Industry

Max
29.52%
Q3
13.18%
Median
6.53%
Q1
1.35%
Min
-11.86%

MOS’s Return on Equity of 7.92% is on par with the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LYB vs. MOS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LYB

0.75%

Chemicals Industry

Max
20.20%
Q3
9.15%
Median
3.94%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-10.43%

LYB’s Net Profit Margin of 0.75% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Chemicals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MOS

8.35%

Chemicals Industry

Max
20.20%
Q3
9.15%
Median
3.94%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-10.43%

MOS’s Net Profit Margin of 8.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Chemicals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LYB vs. MOS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LYB

1.52%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.82%
Median
7.98%
Q1
3.60%
Min
-7.61%

LYB’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.52% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MOS

7.09%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.82%
Median
7.98%
Q1
3.60%
Min
-7.61%

MOS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.09% is around the midpoint for the Chemicals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LYB vs. MOS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLYBMOS
Return on Equity (TTM)2.08%7.92%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.73%4.01%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.75%8.35%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.52%7.09%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)9.47%15.33%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LYB

1.77

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
2.38
Median
1.69
Q1
1.42
Min
0.75

LYB’s Current Ratio of 1.77 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MOS

1.14

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
2.38
Median
1.69
Q1
1.42
Min
0.75

MOS’s Current Ratio of 1.14 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LYB vs. MOS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LYB

0.99

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.53
Q3
1.00
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

LYB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.99 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MOS

0.35

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.53
Q3
1.00
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, MOS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.35 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LYB vs. MOS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LYB

3.85

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
8.84
Q1
2.54
Min
-9.39

LYB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.85 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MOS

2.00

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
8.84
Q1
2.54
Min
-9.39

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, MOS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.00 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LYB vs. MOS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLYBMOS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.771.14
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.920.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.990.35
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.852.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

LYB vs. MOS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LYB vs. MOS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LYB

11.01%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.67%
Median
2.44%
Q1
1.36%
Min
0.00%

LYB’s Dividend Yield of 11.01% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Chemicals industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

MOS

2.48%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.67%
Median
2.44%
Q1
1.36%
Min
0.00%

MOS’s Dividend Yield of 2.48% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LYB vs. MOS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LYB

152.02%

Chemicals Industry

Max
192.00%
Q3
108.95%
Median
57.38%
Q1
27.28%
Min
0.00%

LYB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 152.02% is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MOS

29.18%

Chemicals Industry

Max
192.00%
Q3
108.95%
Median
57.38%
Q1
27.28%
Min
0.00%

MOS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.18% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LYB vs. MOS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLYBMOS
Dividend Yield (TTM)11.01%2.48%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)152.02%29.18%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LYB

60.73

Chemicals Industry

Max
49.43
Q3
32.03
Median
21.32
Q1
14.93
Min
8.66

At 60.73, LYB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MOS

11.78

Chemicals Industry

Max
49.43
Q3
32.03
Median
21.32
Q1
14.93
Min
8.66

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, MOS’s P/E Ratio of 11.78 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LYB vs. MOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LYB

0.45

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.23
Median
1.00
Q1
0.55
Min
0.15

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, LYB’s P/S Ratio of 0.45 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MOS

0.98

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.23
Median
1.00
Q1
0.55
Min
0.15

MOS’s P/S Ratio of 0.98 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LYB vs. MOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LYB

1.56

Chemicals Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.59
Median
1.50
Q1
0.95
Min
0.30

LYB’s P/B Ratio of 1.56 is within the conventional range for the Chemicals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MOS

0.93

Chemicals Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.59
Median
1.50
Q1
0.95
Min
0.30

MOS’s P/B Ratio of 0.93 is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LYB vs. MOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLYBMOS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)60.7311.78
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.450.98
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.560.93
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.1729.36