LVS vs. YUMC: Las Vegas Sands vs. Yum China Stock Comparison
How do Las Vegas Sands (LVS) and Yum China (YUMC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Las Vegas Sands (LVS) and Yum China (YUMC) both belong to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, though LVS is classified under Casinos & Gaming while YUMC falls under Restaurants.
| Profile Item | LVS | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Las Vegas Sands Corp. | Yum China Holdings, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | China |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry Group | Consumer Services | Consumer Services |
| GICS Industry | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Casinos & Gaming | Restaurants |
| Market Capitalization | 26.38 billion USD | 16.79 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 15, 2004 | October 17, 2016 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | LVS | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -35.88% | 17.02% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.18% | 6.80% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 1.29% | -0.60% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | LVS | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 30.94% | 25.40% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.73 | 0.01 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -51.18% | -53.84% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 5.72M | 1.59M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | LVS | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -1.30 | 0.50 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -1.63 | 0.77 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Las Vegas Sands (LVS) at 207.08% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Yum China (YUMC) at 17.35%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
LVS
Consumer Services industry group
207.08%
- LVS
- 207.08%
- Max
- 76.75%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- Median
- 15.90%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -40.61%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
17.35%
- Max
- 76.75%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- YUMC
- 17.35%
- Median
- 15.90%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -40.61%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Las Vegas Sands (LVS) at 11.85% and Yum China (YUMC) at 7.90% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
LVS
Consumer Services industry group
11.85%
- Max
- 25.52%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- LVS
- 11.85%
- Median
- 6.63%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -14.36%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
7.90%
- Max
- 25.52%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- YUMC
- 7.90%
- Median
- 6.63%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -14.36%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Las Vegas Sands (LVS) at 19.34% and Yum China (YUMC) at 13.09% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
LVS
Consumer Services industry group
19.34%
- Max
- 49.05%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- LVS
- 19.34%
- Median
- 14.23%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- Min
- -16.47%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
13.09%
- Max
- 49.05%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- Median
- 14.23%
- YUMC
- 13.09%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- Min
- -16.47%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | LVS | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 207.08% | 17.35% |
| ROA (TTM) | 9.24% | 7.81% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.85% | 7.90% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.34% | 13.09% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 78.63% | 20.45% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Las Vegas Sands (LVS) at 15.22% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Yum China (YUMC) at 4.37% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for LVS.
EPS Growth
Both Las Vegas Sands (LVS) at 19.90% and Yum China (YUMC) at 7.73% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | LVS | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 15.22% | 4.37% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 46.86% | 7.23% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 19.90% | 7.73% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.70% | 34.14% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Las Vegas Sands (LVS) at 0.83 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Yum China (YUMC) at 0.67 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for YUMC.
LVS
Consumer Services industry group
0.83
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 1.85
- Median
- 1.06
- LVS
- 0.83
- Q1
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.22
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
0.67
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 1.85
- Median
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.72
- YUMC
- 0.67
- Min
- 0.22
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Yum China (YUMC) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.54 against its industry range, while Las Vegas Sands (LVS) reports no figure this period.
LVS
Consumer Services industry group
--
- Max
- 6.12
- Q3
- 2.93
- Median
- 1.29
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
- LVS
- --
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
0.54
- Max
- 6.12
- Q3
- 2.93
- Median
- 1.29
- YUMC
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | LVS | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.83 | 0.67 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | 0.54 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.83 | 0.85 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Las Vegas Sands (LVS) at 2.93% and Yum China (YUMC) at 2.23% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.
LVS
Consumer Services industry group
2.93%
- Max
- 4.10%
- LVS
- 2.93%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
2.23%
- Max
- 4.10%
- YUMC
- 2.23%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Las Vegas Sands (LVS) at 47.13% and Yum China (YUMC) at 38.54% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
LVS
Consumer Services industry group
47.13%
- Max
- 89.80%
- LVS
- 47.13%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
38.54%
- Max
- 89.80%
- YUMC
- 38.54%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | LVS | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.93% | 2.23% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 47.13% | 38.54% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Las Vegas Sands (LVS) at 16.69 and Yum China (YUMC) at 17.34 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
LVS
Consumer Services industry group
16.69
- Max
- 71.70
- Q3
- 37.12
- Median
- 21.88
- LVS
- 16.69
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
17.34
- Max
- 71.70
- Q3
- 37.12
- Median
- 21.88
- YUMC
- 17.34
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Las Vegas Sands (LVS) at 1.94 and Yum China (YUMC) at 1.32 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
LVS
Consumer Services industry group
1.94
- Max
- 6.40
- Q3
- 3.01
- LVS
- 1.94
- Median
- 1.54
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
1.32
- Max
- 6.40
- Q3
- 3.01
- Median
- 1.54
- YUMC
- 1.32
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Las Vegas Sands (LVS) reports a negative P/B ratio of -74.19, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Yum China (YUMC) reports 3.19, ranking against industry peers normally.
LVS
Consumer Services industry group
-74.19
- Max
- 12.02
- Q3
- 5.58
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
- LVS
- -74.19
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
3.19
- Max
- 12.02
- Q3
- 5.58
- YUMC
- 3.19
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LVS | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 16.69 | 17.34 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.94 | 1.32 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | -74.19 | 3.19 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 7.99% | -2.30% |