Seek Returns logo

LVS vs. SE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LVS and SE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LVS is a standard domestic listing, while SE trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolLVSSE
Company NameLas Vegas Sands Corp.Sea Limited
CountryUnited StatesSingapore
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryCommunication Services
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureEntertainment
Market Capitalization35.97 billion USD92.74 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 15, 2004October 20, 2017
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LVS and SE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LVS vs. SE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLVSSE
5-Day Price Return-0.02%-0.67%
13-Week Price Return43.29%16.97%
26-Week Price Return20.46%32.99%
52-Week Price Return32.76%140.85%
Month-to-Date Return20.43%-2.06%
Year-to-Date Return2.02%47.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.31M3.75M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.99M4.65M
3-Month Volatility35.29%40.08%
Beta-0.34-0.15

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LVS

51.35%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

In the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, LVS’s Return on Equity of 51.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SE

10.85%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

SE’s Return on Equity of 10.85% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LVS vs. SE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LVS

12.16%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

LVS’s Net Profit Margin of 12.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SE

4.86%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, SE’s Net Profit Margin of 4.86% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LVS vs. SE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LVS

21.36%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.36% places LVS in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SE

5.99%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

SE’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.99% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LVS vs. SE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLVSSE
Return on Equity (TTM)51.35%10.85%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.64%3.97%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.16%4.86%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.36%5.99%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.98%44.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LVS

1.22

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

LVS’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SE

1.51

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

SE’s Current Ratio of 1.51 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LVS vs. SE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LVS

7.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

LVS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 7.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SE

0.68

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

SE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.68 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LVS vs. SE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LVS

5.34

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

LVS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SE

-6.05

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

SE has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

LVS vs. SE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLVSSE
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.221.51
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.141.33
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)7.950.68
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.34-6.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

LVS vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LVS vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LVS

1.99%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LVS’s Dividend Yield of 1.99% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LVS vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LVS

50.71%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LVS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.71% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LVS vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLVSSE
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.99%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)50.71%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LVS

25.45

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

LVS’s P/E Ratio of 25.45 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SE

108.24

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

At 108.24, SE’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Entertainment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LVS vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LVS

3.09

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

LVS’s P/S Ratio of 3.09 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SE

5.26

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

SE’s P/S Ratio of 5.26 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LVS vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LVS

15.44

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

LVS’s P/B Ratio of 15.44 is in the upper tier for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SE

8.33

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

SE’s P/B Ratio of 8.33 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LVS vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLVSSE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.45108.24
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.095.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)15.448.33
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.4128.77