Seek Returns logo

LVS vs. SCI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LVS and SCI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLVSSCI
Company NameLas Vegas Sands Corp.Service Corporation International
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureDiversified Consumer Services
Market Capitalization38.59 billion USD11.21 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 15, 2004March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LVS and SCI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LVS vs. SCI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLVSSCI
5-Day Price Return4.89%-2.18%
13-Week Price Return40.23%4.32%
26-Week Price Return27.66%1.28%
52-Week Price Return36.89%4.83%
Month-to-Date Return7.29%4.70%
Year-to-Date Return9.46%0.10%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.15M0.77M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.30M1.06M
3-Month Volatility32.54%16.62%
Beta1.020.91

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LVS

51.35%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

In the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, LVS’s Return on Equity of 51.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SCI

32.84%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
32.65%
Q3
29.77%
Median
16.63%
Q1
11.08%
Min
2.26%

SCI’s Return on Equity of 32.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LVS vs. SCI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LVS

12.16%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

LVS’s Net Profit Margin of 12.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SCI

12.60%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
18.84%
Q3
13.34%
Median
12.22%
Q1
7.92%
Min
3.76%

SCI’s Net Profit Margin of 12.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LVS vs. SCI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LVS

21.36%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.36% places LVS in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SCI

22.39%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
19.23%
Median
15.23%
Q1
8.71%
Min
-0.71%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.39% places SCI in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LVS vs. SCI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLVSSCI
Return on Equity (TTM)51.35%32.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.64%3.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.16%12.60%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.36%22.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.98%26.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LVS

1.22

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

LVS’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SCI

0.61

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
1.97
Median
1.66
Q1
0.60
Min
0.15

SCI’s Current Ratio of 0.61 aligns with the median group of the Diversified Consumer Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LVS vs. SCI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LVS

7.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

LVS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 7.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SCI

3.23

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
1.22
Median
0.36
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.23, SCI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Diversified Consumer Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LVS vs. SCI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LVS

5.34

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

LVS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SCI

3.62

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
13.44
Q3
10.58
Median
5.57
Q1
3.04
Min
-2.17

SCI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.62 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LVS vs. SCI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLVSSCI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.220.61
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.140.56
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)7.953.23
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.343.62

Growth

Revenue Growth

LVS vs. SCI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LVS vs. SCI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LVS

1.93%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LVS’s Dividend Yield of 1.93% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SCI

1.57%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
2.29%
Q3
0.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.57%, SCI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LVS vs. SCI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LVS

50.71%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LVS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.71% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SCI

33.29%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
35.94%
Q3
25.79%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SCI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.29% is in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LVS vs. SCI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLVSSCI
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.93%1.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)50.71%33.29%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LVS

26.23

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

LVS’s P/E Ratio of 26.23 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SCI

21.22

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
33.95
Q3
25.14
Median
19.27
Q1
15.30
Min
5.58

SCI’s P/E Ratio of 21.22 is within the middle range for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LVS vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LVS

3.19

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

LVS’s P/S Ratio of 3.19 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SCI

2.67

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
3.29
Q3
2.54
Median
2.27
Q1
1.92
Min
1.28

SCI’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 is in the upper echelon for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LVS vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LVS

15.44

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

LVS’s P/B Ratio of 15.44 is in the upper tier for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SCI

7.43

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
7.00
Q3
6.37
Median
3.31
Q1
2.13
Min
0.98

At 7.43, SCI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LVS vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLVSSCI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.2321.22
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.192.67
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)15.447.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)31.3317.99