Seek Returns logo

LVS vs. MBLY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LVS and MBLY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLVSMBLY
Company NameLas Vegas Sands Corp.Mobileye Global Inc.
CountryUnited StatesIsrael
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization37.60 billion USD11.27 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 15, 2004October 26, 2022
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LVS and MBLY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LVS vs. MBLY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLVSMBLY
5-Day Price Return1.51%1.07%
13-Week Price Return23.63%-21.47%
26-Week Price Return33.44%-12.30%
52-Week Price Return5.22%-1.88%
Month-to-Date Return-6.66%0.79%
Year-to-Date Return4.73%-29.12%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.36M5.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.97M5.90M
3-Month Volatility28.24%42.50%
Beta1.030.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LVS

51.35%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

In the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, LVS’s Return on Equity of 51.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MBLY

-24.48%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.51%
Median
7.91%
Q1
5.60%
Min
-2.27%

MBLY has a negative Return on Equity of -24.48%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

LVS vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LVS

12.16%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

LVS’s Net Profit Margin of 12.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MBLY

-153.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
13.51%
Q3
7.21%
Median
5.02%
Q1
2.32%
Min
-3.89%

MBLY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -153.91%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

LVS vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LVS

21.36%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

LVS’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.36% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MBLY

-160.62%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.92%
Q3
10.29%
Median
6.94%
Q1
3.64%
Min
-0.31%

MBLY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -160.62%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

LVS vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLVSMBLY
Return on Equity (TTM)51.35%-24.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.64%-23.52%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.16%-153.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.36%-160.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.98%48.80%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LVS

1.22

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

LVS’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MBLY

6.91

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
2.54
Median
1.80
Q1
1.36
Min
0.79

MBLY’s Current Ratio of 6.91 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

LVS vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LVS

7.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

LVS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 7.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MBLY

0.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.68
Median
0.38
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MBLY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LVS vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LVS

5.34

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

LVS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MBLY

-4.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
80.10
Q3
35.45
Median
11.20
Q1
4.03
Min
-21.51

MBLY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.33. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

LVS vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLVSMBLY
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.226.91
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.145.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)7.950.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.34-4.33

Growth

Revenue Growth

LVS vs. MBLY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LVS vs. MBLY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LVS

1.92%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LVS’s Dividend Yield of 1.92% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
5.41%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.23%
Q1
1.18%
Min
0.00%

MBLY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LVS vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LVS

50.71%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LVS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.71% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
99.04%
Q3
60.04%
Median
39.38%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

MBLY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LVS vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLVSMBLY
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.92%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)50.71%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LVS

26.39

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

LVS’s P/E Ratio of 26.39 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MBLY

--

Automobile Components Industry

Max
32.42
Q3
21.41
Median
15.09
Q1
13.02
Min
2.51

P/E Ratio data for MBLY is currently unavailable.

LVS vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LVS

3.21

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

LVS’s P/S Ratio of 3.21 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MBLY

6.07

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.13
Median
0.78
Q1
0.39
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 6.07, MBLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobile Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LVS vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LVS

15.44

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

LVS’s P/B Ratio of 15.44 is in the upper tier for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MBLY

1.21

Automobile Components Industry

Max
3.57
Q3
1.91
Median
1.08
Q1
0.78
Min
0.46

MBLY’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LVS vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLVSMBLY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.39--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.216.07
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)15.441.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)31.5319.77