Seek Returns logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

LVMHF vs. TSLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here's a clear look at LVMHF and TSLA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLVMHFTSLA
Company NameLVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société EuropéenneTesla, Inc.
CountryFranceUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS Industry GroupConsumer Durables & ApparelAutomobiles & Components
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsAutomobiles
GICS Sub-IndustryApparel, Accessories & Luxury GoodsAutomobile Manufacturers
Market Capitalization270.76 billion USD1,353.09 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeOTC Markets OTCPKNasdaqGS
Listing DateApril 26, 2010June 29, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

TSLA's market capitalization (1,353.09 billion USD) is significantly greater than LVMHF's (270.76 billion USD), highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LVMHF and TSLA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LVMHF vs. TSLA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLVMHFTSLA
5-Day Price Return3.36%-0.34%
13-Week Price Return-26.60%-20.65%
26-Week Price Return-9.50%-18.12%
52-Week Price Return-9.38%27.53%
Month-to-Date Return1.72%-3.00%
Year-to-Date Return-26.97%-19.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.60M67.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.46M65.64M
3-Month Volatility30.30%37.11%
Beta1.081.92

TSLA carries a higher beta at 1.92, indicating it's more sensitive to market moves, while LVMHF (beta: 1.08) exhibits greater stability.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LVMHF

16.54%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
45.05%
Q3
23.75%
Median
16.54%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-5.37%

LVMHF's Return on Equity of 16.54% is on par with the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TSLA

4.83%

Automobiles Industry
Max
29.64%
Q3
10.26%
Median
3.96%
Q1
-3.75%
Min
-19.13%

TSLA's Return on Equity of 4.83% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LVMHF vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LVMHF

13.26%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
28.16%
Q3
13.73%
Median
6.95%
Q1
3.54%
Min
-10.44%

LVMHF's Net Profit Margin of 13.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TSLA

4.00%

Automobiles Industry
Max
10.28%
Q3
4.56%
Median
2.22%
Q1
-1.49%
Min
-9.10%

TSLA's Net Profit Margin of 4.00% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LVMHF vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LVMHF

20.87%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
41.17%
Q3
20.96%
Median
12.51%
Q1
5.73%
Min
-4.90%

LVMHF's Operating Profit Margin of 20.87% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TSLA

4.59%

Automobiles Industry
Max
12.16%
Q3
5.54%
Median
2.75%
Q1
-3.61%
Min
-13.71%

TSLA's Operating Profit Margin of 4.59% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LVMHF vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLVMHFTSLA
Return on Equity (TTM)16.54%4.83%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.55%2.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.26%4.00%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.87%4.59%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)66.03%18.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LVMHF

1.48

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
2.86
Q3
2.20
Median
1.66
Q1
1.47
Min
0.75

LVMHF's Current Ratio of 1.48 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TSLA

2.16

Automobiles Industry
Max
2.49
Q3
1.66
Median
1.27
Q1
1.09
Min
0.51

TSLA's Current Ratio of 2.16 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LVMHF vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LVMHF

0.60

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
2.84
Q3
1.38
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

LVMHF's Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TSLA

0.10

Automobiles Industry
Max
2.13
Q3
1.09
Median
0.83
Q1
0.25
Min
0.10

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, TSLA's Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.10 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LVMHF vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LVMHF

61.50

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
85.38
Q3
37.37
Median
8.74
Q1
3.85
Min
-32.49

LVMHF's Interest Coverage Ratio of 61.50 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TSLA

71.48

Automobiles Industry
Max
132.59
Q3
52.77
Median
7.40
Q1
-3.83
Min
-60.25

TSLA's Interest Coverage Ratio of 71.48 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LVMHF vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLVMHFTSLA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.482.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.681.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.600.10
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)61.5071.48

Growth

Revenue Growth

LVMHF vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolLVMHFTSLA
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)-4.48%-3.14%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)-3.24%-2.93%
3-Year Revenue CAGR0.68%5.19%
5-Year Revenue CAGR12.60%24.63%

EPS Growth

LVMHF vs. TSLA: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolLVMHFTSLA
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)-21.42%-63.88%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)-21.26%-48.56%
3-Year EPS CAGR-7.97%-33.28%
5-Year EPS CAGR18.56%38.32%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LVMHF

2.87%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
5.94%
Q3
3.62%
Median
2.45%
Q1
1.29%
Min
0.00%

LVMHF's Dividend Yield of 2.87% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry
Max
11.66%
Q3
5.74%
Median
2.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSLA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LVMHF vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LVMHF

61.30%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
203.80%
Q3
104.14%
Median
54.33%
Q1
31.52%
Min
0.00%

LVMHF's Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.30% is within the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry
Max
172.78%
Q3
81.19%
Median
40.13%
Q1
1.18%
Min
0.00%

TSLA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LVMHF vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLVMHFTSLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.87%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)61.30%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LVMHF

21.32

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
55.49
Q3
32.51
Median
21.32
Q1
12.55
Min
6.93

LVMHF's P/E Ratio of 21.32 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TSLA

356.64

Automobiles Industry
Max
136.26
Q3
68.41
Median
12.75
Q1
8.53
Min
5.95

At 356.64, TSLA's P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LVMHF vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LVMHF

2.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
4.64
Q3
2.69
Median
1.62
Q1
0.97
Min
0.39

LVMHF's P/S Ratio of 2.83 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TSLA

14.27

Automobiles Industry
Max
1.92
Q3
0.94
Median
0.45
Q1
0.23
Min
0.10

With a P/S Ratio of 14.27, TSLA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LVMHF vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LVMHF

3.41

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
9.65
Q3
5.23
Median
3.57
Q1
2.15
Min
0.59

LVMHF's P/B Ratio of 3.41 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock's price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TSLA

18.21

Automobiles Industry
Max
2.89
Q3
1.66
Median
0.97
Q1
0.55
Min
0.14

At 18.21, TSLA's P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market's valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LVMHF vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLVMHFTSLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.32356.64
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.8314.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.4118.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.27217.54