LUV vs. TRI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 25, 2025

Here’s a clear look at LUV and TRI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	LUV	TRI
Company Name	Southwest Airlines Co.	Thomson Reuters Corporation
Country	United States	Canada
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Passenger Airlines	Professional Services
Market Capitalization	17.21 billion USD	80.47 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	January 2, 1980	June 12, 2002
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LUV and TRI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LUV vs. TRI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	LUV	TRI
5-Day Price Return	4.66%	3.39%
13-Week Price Return	3.18%	-8.27%
26-Week Price Return	9.23%	0.21%
52-Week Price Return	23.29%	9.38%
Month-to-Date Return	5.95%	-11.23%
Year-to-Date Return	-2.53%	6.95%
10-Day Avg. Volume	7.37M	0.52M
3-Month Avg. Volume	11.58M	0.37M
3-Month Volatility	41.84%	29.71%
Beta	1.23	0.51

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LUV

4.11%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 49.96%
Q3: 28.15%
Median: 15.41%
Q1: 8.29%
Min: -11.01%

LUV’s Return on Equity of 4.11% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

TRI

13.40%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 52.17%
Q3: 30.06%
Median: 22.21%
Q1: 11.67%
Min: -13.44%

TRI’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LUV vs. TRI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LUV

1.43%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 17.65%
Q3: 8.90%
Median: 5.80%
Q1: 2.02%
Min: -3.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Net Profit Margin of 1.43% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TRI

22.34%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 26.06%
Q3: 13.34%
Median: 7.88%
Q1: 3.50%
Min: -2.93%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.34% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LUV vs. TRI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LUV

1.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.47%
Q3: 12.33%
Median: 8.62%
Q1: 4.43%
Min: -2.88%

LUV’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.15% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TRI

29.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 35.84%
Q3: 19.38%
Median: 12.54%
Q1: 7.36%
Min: -5.21%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.19% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LUV vs. TRI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	LUV	TRI
Return on Equity (TTM)	4.11%	13.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)	1.20%	8.92%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	1.43%	22.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	1.15%	29.19%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	73.31%	95.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LUV

0.56

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.46
Q3: 0.94
Median: 0.76
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.17

LUV’s Current Ratio of 0.56 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TRI

0.79

Professional Services Industry

Max: 2.45
Q3: 1.65
Median: 1.26
Q1: 1.10
Min: 0.47

TRI’s Current Ratio of 0.79 falls into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LUV vs. TRI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LUV

0.51

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 9.80
Q3: 4.82
Median: 1.30
Q1: 0.89
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TRI

0.17

Professional Services Industry

Max: 2.63
Q3: 1.44
Median: 0.91
Q1: 0.49
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, TRI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LUV vs. TRI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LUV

9.27

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.60
Q3: 16.29
Median: 6.75
Q1: 1.94
Min: -8.55

LUV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.27 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TRI

17.23

Professional Services Industry

Max: 39.67
Q3: 20.05
Median: 11.07
Q1: 5.36
Min: -2.22

TRI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LUV vs. TRI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	LUV	TRI
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.56	0.79
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.45	0.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.51	0.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	9.27	17.23

Growth

Revenue Growth

LUV vs. TRI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LUV vs. TRI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LUV

2.58%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 6.71%
Q3: 3.95%
Median: 1.10%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Yield of 2.58% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TRI

1.26%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 5.28%
Q3: 2.51%
Median: 1.63%
Q1: 0.62%
Min: 0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Yield of 1.26% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LUV vs. TRI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LUV

59.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 71.59%
Q3: 38.54%
Median: 8.16%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.15% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

TRI

60.86%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 109.23%
Q3: 64.39%
Median: 47.00%
Q1: 20.35%
Min: 0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.86% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LUV vs. TRI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	LUV	TRI
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.58%	1.26%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	59.15%	60.86%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LUV

42.24

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 13.29
Q3: 11.94
Median: 8.78
Q1: 7.42
Min: 3.07

At 42.24, LUV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TRI

48.19

Professional Services Industry

Max: 49.59
Q3: 36.59
Median: 28.13
Q1: 18.55
Min: 10.07

A P/E Ratio of 48.19 places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LUV vs. TRI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LUV

0.60

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.09
Q3: 0.74
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.44
Min: 0.09

LUV’s P/S Ratio of 0.60 aligns with the market consensus for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TRI

10.77

Professional Services Industry

Max: 9.54
Q3: 5.11
Median: 2.10
Q1: 0.75
Min: 0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 10.77, TRI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LUV vs. TRI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LUV

2.31

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 3.44
Q3: 2.89
Median: 1.84
Q1: 1.22
Min: 0.56

LUV’s P/B Ratio of 2.31 is within the conventional range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TRI

7.05

Professional Services Industry

Max: 13.75
Q3: 8.87
Median: 4.35
Q1: 2.43
Min: 0.54

TRI’s P/B Ratio of 7.05 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LUV vs. TRI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	LUV	TRI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	42.24	48.19
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.60	10.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.31	7.05
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	44.16	41.75