Seek Returns logo

LUV vs. RTO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LUV and RTO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LUV is a standard domestic listing, while RTO trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolLUVRTO
Company NameSouthwest Airlines Co.Rentokil Initial plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryPassenger AirlinesCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization16.38 billion USD12.40 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1980November 18, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LUV and RTO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LUV vs. RTO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLUVRTO
5-Day Price Return1.56%-2.47%
13-Week Price Return-4.33%3.18%
26-Week Price Return4.18%-12.52%
52-Week Price Return16.65%-24.83%
Month-to-Date Return0.81%-4.27%
Year-to-Date Return-7.26%-9.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.38M3.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume11.72M4.20M
3-Month Volatility40.41%31.78%
Beta1.230.93

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LUV

4.11%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
28.15%
Median
15.41%
Q1
8.29%
Min
-11.01%

LUV’s Return on Equity of 4.11% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

RTO

6.17%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

RTO’s Return on Equity of 6.17% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

LUV vs. RTO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LUV

1.43%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
17.65%
Q3
8.90%
Median
5.80%
Q1
2.02%
Min
-3.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Net Profit Margin of 1.43% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

RTO

5.49%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

RTO’s Net Profit Margin of 5.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LUV vs. RTO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LUV

1.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.33%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-2.88%

LUV’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.15% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

RTO

9.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

RTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.93% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LUV vs. RTO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLUVRTO
Return on Equity (TTM)4.11%6.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.20%2.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.43%5.49%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.15%9.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)73.31%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LUV

0.56

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.94
Median
0.76
Q1
0.54
Min
0.17

LUV’s Current Ratio of 0.56 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RTO

1.12

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

RTO’s Current Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LUV vs. RTO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LUV

0.51

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
9.80
Q3
4.82
Median
1.30
Q1
0.89
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

RTO

1.14

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

RTO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.14. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LUV vs. RTO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LUV

9.27

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
16.29
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

LUV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.27 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RTO

5.22

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

RTO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LUV vs. RTO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLUVRTO
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.561.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.451.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.511.14
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.275.22

Growth

Revenue Growth

LUV vs. RTO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LUV vs. RTO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LUV

2.58%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
3.95%
Median
1.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Yield of 2.58% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RTO

3.44%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

RTO’s Dividend Yield of 3.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

LUV vs. RTO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LUV

59.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
71.59%
Q3
38.54%
Median
8.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.15% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

RTO

93.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

RTO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 93.97% is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LUV vs. RTO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLUVRTO
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.58%3.44%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)59.15%93.97%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LUV

42.24

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
13.29
Q3
11.94
Median
8.78
Q1
7.42
Min
3.07

At 42.24, LUV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

RTO

27.30

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

RTO’s P/E Ratio of 27.30 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LUV vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LUV

0.60

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.74
Median
0.61
Q1
0.44
Min
0.09

LUV’s P/S Ratio of 0.60 aligns with the market consensus for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RTO

1.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

RTO’s P/S Ratio of 1.50 aligns with the market consensus for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LUV vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LUV

2.31

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
2.89
Median
1.84
Q1
1.22
Min
0.56

LUV’s P/B Ratio of 2.31 is within the conventional range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RTO

1.69

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

RTO’s P/B Ratio of 1.69 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LUV vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLUVRTO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)42.2427.30
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.601.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.311.69
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)44.1613.32