Seek Returns logo

LUV vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LUV and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLUVPWR
Company NameSouthwest Airlines Co.Quanta Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryPassenger AirlinesConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization17.08 billion USD56.37 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1980February 12, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LUV and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LUV vs. PWR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLUVPWR
5-Day Price Return2.94%-0.25%
13-Week Price Return4.20%14.35%
26-Week Price Return7.68%29.53%
52-Week Price Return20.76%41.27%
Month-to-Date Return5.14%-6.85%
Year-to-Date Return-3.27%19.70%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.36M0.99M
3-Month Avg. Volume11.57M1.18M
3-Month Volatility41.62%22.83%
Beta1.231.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LUV

4.11%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
28.15%
Median
15.41%
Q1
8.29%
Min
-11.01%

LUV’s Return on Equity of 4.11% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LUV vs. PWR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LUV

1.43%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
17.65%
Q3
8.90%
Median
5.80%
Q1
2.02%
Min
-3.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Net Profit Margin of 1.43% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LUV vs. PWR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LUV

1.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.33%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-2.88%

LUV’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.15% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LUV vs. PWR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLUVPWR
Return on Equity (TTM)4.11%13.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.20%5.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.43%3.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.15%5.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)73.31%15.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LUV

0.56

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.94
Median
0.76
Q1
0.54
Min
0.17

LUV’s Current Ratio of 0.56 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LUV vs. PWR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LUV

0.51

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
9.80
Q3
4.82
Median
1.30
Q1
0.89
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LUV vs. PWR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LUV

9.27

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
16.29
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

LUV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.27 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LUV vs. PWR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLUVPWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.561.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.451.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.510.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.2710.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

LUV vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LUV vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LUV

2.58%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
3.95%
Median
1.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Yield of 2.58% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PWR

0.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

LUV vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LUV

59.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
71.59%
Q3
38.54%
Median
8.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.15% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

LUV vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLUVPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.58%0.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)59.15%5.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LUV

42.24

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
13.29
Q3
11.94
Median
8.78
Q1
7.42
Min
3.07

At 42.24, LUV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

PWR

57.10

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 57.10, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LUV vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LUV

0.60

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.74
Median
0.61
Q1
0.44
Min
0.09

LUV’s P/S Ratio of 0.60 aligns with the market consensus for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PWR

2.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.13 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LUV vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LUV

2.31

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
2.89
Median
1.84
Q1
1.22
Min
0.56

LUV’s P/B Ratio of 2.31 is within the conventional range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.13, PWR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LUV vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLUVPWR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)42.2457.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.602.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.317.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)44.1640.85