LULU vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at LULU and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
LULU is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.
| Symbol | LULU | VIPS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | lululemon athletica inc. | Vipshop Holdings Limited |
| Country | Canada | China |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry | Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | Broadline Retail |
| Market Capitalization | 24.26 billion USD | 8.36 billion USD |
| Exchange | NasdaqGS | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 27, 2007 | March 23, 2012 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of LULU and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | LULU | VIPS |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | 2.42% | 2.17% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -36.83% | 16.56% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -44.87% | 16.40% |
| 52-Week Price Return | -23.16% | 35.57% |
| Month-to-Date Return | 0.95% | 12.39% |
| Year-to-Date Return | -47.06% | 25.91% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 3.75M | 2.93M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 3.03M | 3.18M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 51.66% | 27.85% |
| Beta | 1.10 | 0.70 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
LULU
43.48%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 53.33%
- Q3
- 26.13%
- Median
- 18.47%
- Q1
- 7.99%
- Min
- -10.49%
In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 43.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
VIPS
18.88%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 49.17%
- Q3
- 28.98%
- Median
- 19.22%
- Q1
- 10.86%
- Min
- -11.14%
VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
LULU
16.82%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 23.35%
- Q3
- 13.49%
- Median
- 8.45%
- Q1
- 4.18%
- Min
- -3.90%
A Net Profit Margin of 16.82% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
VIPS
6.88%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 19.78%
- Q3
- 11.90%
- Median
- 8.63%
- Q1
- 5.21%
- Min
- 0.82%
VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
LULU
23.36%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 29.47%
- Q3
- 20.87%
- Median
- 13.00%
- Q1
- 7.02%
- Min
- -3.59%
An Operating Profit Margin of 23.36% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
VIPS
8.06%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 27.23%
- Q3
- 15.96%
- Median
- 11.13%
- Q1
- 8.31%
- Min
- 1.77%
VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | LULU | VIPS |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 43.48% | 18.88% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 25.05% | 10.28% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 16.82% | 6.88% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 23.36% | 8.06% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 59.34% | 23.36% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
LULU
2.28
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 3.91
- Q3
- 2.49
- Median
- 1.89
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.80
LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.28 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
VIPS
1.28
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 3.54
- Q3
- 2.42
- Median
- 1.49
- Q1
- 1.22
- Min
- 0.67
VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
LULU
0.00
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 2.67
- Q3
- 1.29
- Median
- 0.59
- Q1
- 0.24
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
VIPS
0.11
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 2.14
- Q3
- 1.34
- Median
- 0.63
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
LULU
-47.83
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 57.00
- Q3
- 35.85
- Median
- 9.20
- Q1
- 4.29
- Min
- -32.49
LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
VIPS
150.47
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 37.34
- Q3
- 20.63
- Median
- 11.28
- Q1
- 4.22
- Min
- -19.29
With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | LULU | VIPS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.28 | 1.28 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.98 | 1.14 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.00 | 0.11 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -47.83 | 150.47 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 6.59%
- Q3
- 3.60%
- Median
- 2.59%
- Q1
- 0.95%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
VIPS
0.00%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 5.46%
- Q3
- 2.38%
- Median
- 0.43%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 195.44%
- Q3
- 106.47%
- Median
- 58.77%
- Q1
- 36.52%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
VIPS
0.00%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 131.17%
- Q3
- 63.48%
- Median
- 29.43%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | LULU | VIPS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
LULU
13.67
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 63.29
- Q3
- 34.64
- Median
- 18.01
- Q1
- 13.88
- Min
- 6.04
In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 13.67 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
VIPS
7.97
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 66.12
- Q3
- 35.17
- Median
- 16.29
- Q1
- 10.47
- Min
- 5.94
In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
LULU
2.30
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 5.46
- Q3
- 3.13
- Median
- 1.72
- Q1
- 0.83
- Min
- 0.26
LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.30 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
VIPS
0.55
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 3.33
- Median
- 2.04
- Q1
- 0.80
- Min
- 0.16
In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.55 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
LULU
7.80
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 9.76
- Q3
- 6.00
- Median
- 3.26
- Q1
- 1.97
- Min
- 0.69
LULU’s P/B Ratio of 7.80 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
VIPS
1.43
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 9.06
- Q3
- 5.22
- Median
- 3.48
- Q1
- 1.90
- Min
- 0.74
VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | LULU | VIPS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 13.67 | 7.97 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 2.30 | 0.55 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 7.80 | 1.43 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 15.57 | -- |