Seek Returns logo

LULU vs. TSLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LULU and TSLA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLULUTSLA
Company Namelululemon athletica inc.Tesla, Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsAutomobiles
Market Capitalization23.74 billion USD1,044.72 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJuly 27, 2007June 29, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LULU and TSLA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LULU vs. TSLA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLULUTSLA
5-Day Price Return1.50%-3.48%
13-Week Price Return-38.80%-5.32%
26-Week Price Return-49.31%-9.00%
52-Week Price Return-23.54%45.43%
Month-to-Date Return-1.20%5.07%
Year-to-Date Return-48.19%-19.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.75M77.14M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.99M104.32M
3-Month Volatility50.78%55.64%
Beta1.102.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LULU

43.48%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 43.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TSLA

8.22%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

TSLA’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LULU vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LULU

16.82%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.82% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TSLA

6.54%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.54% places TSLA in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LULU vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LULU

23.36%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.36% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TSLA

6.06%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

TSLA’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.06% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LULU vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLULUTSLA
Return on Equity (TTM)43.48%8.22%
Return on Assets (TTM)25.05%4.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.82%6.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.36%6.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.34%17.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

2.28

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.28 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TSLA

2.04

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

TSLA’s Current Ratio of 2.04 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LULU vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TSLA

0.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, TSLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LULU vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TSLA

71.48

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

TSLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 71.48 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LULU vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLULUTSLA
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.282.04
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.981.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-47.8371.48

Growth

Revenue Growth

LULU vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LULU vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSLA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LULU vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

TSLA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LULU vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLULUTSLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LULU

13.67

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 13.67 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TSLA

172.34

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

At 172.34, TSLA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LULU vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LULU

2.30

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.30 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TSLA

11.27

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 11.27, TSLA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LULU vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

7.80

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 7.80 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TSLA

13.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 13.23, TSLA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LULU vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLULUTSLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)13.67172.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.3011.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.8013.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.57187.03