LULU vs. TSCO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 18, 2025

Here’s a clear look at LULU and TSCO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	LULU	TSCO
Company Name	lululemon athletica inc.	Tractor Supply Company
Country	Canada	United States
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods	Specialty Retail
Market Capitalization	24.03 billion USD	31.65 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	July 27, 2007	February 17, 1994
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LULU and TSCO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LULU vs. TSCO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	LULU	TSCO
5-Day Price Return	4.89%	-0.48%
13-Week Price Return	-34.09%	13.30%
26-Week Price Return	-51.32%	12.57%
52-Week Price Return	-16.36%	13.88%
Month-to-Date Return	-0.02%	4.88%
Year-to-Date Return	-47.57%	12.57%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.40M	4.33M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.04M	5.92M
3-Month Volatility	53.70%	25.97%
Beta	1.10	0.74

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LULU

43.48%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 53.33%
Q3: 26.13%
Median: 18.47%
Q1: 7.99%
Min: -10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 43.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TSCO

46.83%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 61.19%
Q3: 37.24%
Median: 18.81%
Q1: 8.92%
Min: -13.03%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, TSCO’s Return on Equity of 46.83% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LULU vs. TSCO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LULU

16.82%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 23.35%
Q3: 13.49%
Median: 8.45%
Q1: 4.18%
Min: -3.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.82% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TSCO

7.18%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 21.28%
Q3: 10.68%
Median: 6.08%
Q1: 2.43%
Min: -4.54%

TSCO’s Net Profit Margin of 7.18% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LULU vs. TSCO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LULU

23.36%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 29.47%
Q3: 20.87%
Median: 13.00%
Q1: 7.02%
Min: -3.59%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.36% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TSCO

9.70%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 33.35%
Q3: 15.84%
Median: 9.34%
Q1: 3.83%
Min: -8.97%

TSCO’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.70% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LULU vs. TSCO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	LULU	TSCO
Return on Equity (TTM)	43.48%	46.83%
Return on Assets (TTM)	25.05%	10.73%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	16.82%	7.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	23.36%	9.70%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	59.34%	36.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

2.28

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 3.91
Q3: 2.49
Median: 1.89
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.80

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.28 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TSCO

1.28

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 2.83
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.39
Q1: 1.11
Min: 0.64

TSCO’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LULU vs. TSCO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 2.67
Q3: 1.29
Median: 0.59
Q1: 0.24
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TSCO

0.68

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 3.02
Q3: 1.57
Median: 0.64
Q1: 0.20
Min: 0.00

TSCO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.68 is typical for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LULU vs. TSCO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 57.00
Q3: 35.85
Median: 9.20
Q1: 4.29
Min: -32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TSCO

26.88

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 48.12
Q3: 35.95
Median: 14.13
Q1: 3.61
Min: -36.00

TSCO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.88 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LULU vs. TSCO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	LULU	TSCO
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.28	1.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.98	0.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.00	0.68
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	-47.83	26.88

Growth

Revenue Growth

LULU vs. TSCO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LULU vs. TSCO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 6.59%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 2.59%
Q1: 0.95%
Min: 0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TSCO

1.52%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 6.53%
Q3: 2.69%
Median: 1.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TSCO’s Dividend Yield of 1.52% is consistent with its peers in the Specialty Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LULU vs. TSCO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 195.44%
Q3: 106.47%
Median: 58.77%
Q1: 36.52%
Min: 0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TSCO

44.10%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 165.81%
Q3: 80.94%
Median: 31.61%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TSCO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.10% is within the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LULU vs. TSCO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	LULU	TSCO
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	1.52%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	44.10%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LULU

13.38

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 63.29
Q3: 34.64
Median: 18.01
Q1: 13.88
Min: 6.04

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 13.38 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TSCO

29.10

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 48.56
Q3: 29.15
Median: 22.00
Q1: 15.46
Min: 7.95

TSCO’s P/E Ratio of 29.10 is within the middle range for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LULU vs. TSCO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LULU

2.25

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 5.46
Q3: 3.13
Median: 1.72
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.25 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TSCO

2.09

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 5.08
Q3: 2.69
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.48
Min: 0.09

TSCO’s P/S Ratio of 2.09 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LULU vs. TSCO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

7.80

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 9.76
Q3: 6.00
Median: 3.26
Q1: 1.97
Min: 0.69

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 7.80 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TSCO

11.24

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 16.93
Q3: 7.98
Median: 3.69
Q1: 1.79
Min: 0.21

TSCO’s P/B Ratio of 11.24 is in the upper tier for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LULU vs. TSCO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	LULU	TSCO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	13.38	29.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.25	2.09
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	7.80	11.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	15.24	34.31