Seek Returns logo

LULU vs. STLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LULU and STLA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLULUSTLA
Company Namelululemon athletica inc.Stellantis N.V.
CountryCanadaNetherlands
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsAutomobiles
Market Capitalization24.26 billion USD28.68 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 27, 2007June 9, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LULU and STLA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LULU vs. STLA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLULUSTLA
5-Day Price Return2.42%3.97%
13-Week Price Return-36.83%-5.66%
26-Week Price Return-44.87%-35.63%
52-Week Price Return-23.16%-41.33%
Month-to-Date Return0.95%11.37%
Year-to-Date Return-47.06%-31.33%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.75M17.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.03M23.55M
3-Month Volatility51.66%46.27%
Beta1.101.68

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LULU

43.48%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 43.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

STLA

-3.09%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

STLA has a negative Return on Equity of -3.09%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

LULU vs. STLA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LULU

16.82%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.82% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

STLA

-1.64%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

STLA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.64%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

LULU vs. STLA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LULU

23.36%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.36% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

STLA

-3.88%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

STLA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.88%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

LULU vs. STLA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLULUSTLA
Return on Equity (TTM)43.48%-3.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)25.05%-1.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.82%-1.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.36%-3.88%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.34%7.74%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

2.28

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.28 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

STLA

1.06

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

STLA’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LULU vs. STLA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

STLA

0.56

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

STLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LULU vs. STLA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

STLA

37.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

STLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 37.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LULU vs. STLA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLULUSTLA
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.281.06
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.980.75
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-47.8337.73

Growth

Revenue Growth

LULU vs. STLA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LULU vs. STLA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

STLA

6.09%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.09%, STLA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobiles industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LULU vs. STLA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

STLA

82.70%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

STLA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 82.70% is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LULU vs. STLA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLULUSTLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%6.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%82.70%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LULU

13.67

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 13.67 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

STLA

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

P/E Ratio data for STLA is currently unavailable.

LULU vs. STLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LULU

2.30

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.30 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

STLA

0.22

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, STLA’s P/S Ratio of 0.22 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LULU vs. STLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

7.80

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 7.80 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

STLA

0.34

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

STLA’s P/B Ratio of 0.34 is in the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LULU vs. STLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLULUSTLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)13.67--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.300.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.800.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.572.65