Seek Returns logo

LULU vs. SCI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LULU and SCI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLULUSCI
Company Namelululemon athletica inc.Service Corporation International
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsDiversified Consumer Services
Market Capitalization20.73 billion USD11.52 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 27, 2007March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LULU and SCI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LULU vs. SCI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLULUSCI
5-Day Price Return-1.90%-1.29%
13-Week Price Return-25.89%0.55%
26-Week Price Return-31.62%0.90%
52-Week Price Return-35.84%9.48%
Month-to-Date Return-1.75%-1.33%
Year-to-Date Return-54.28%2.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.90M1.00M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.69M0.99M
3-Month Volatility49.37%18.73%
Beta1.030.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LULU

42.05%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 42.05% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SCI

32.84%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
32.84%
Q3
21.21%
Median
13.32%
Q1
11.02%
Min
0.11%

In the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, SCI’s Return on Equity of 32.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LULU vs. SCI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LULU

16.38%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.38% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SCI

12.60%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
20.09%
Q3
13.26%
Median
12.53%
Q1
7.59%
Min
0.13%

SCI’s Net Profit Margin of 12.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LULU vs. SCI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LULU

22.88%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.88% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SCI

22.39%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
26.98%
Q3
22.01%
Median
15.97%
Q1
9.54%
Min
0.80%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.39% places SCI in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LULU vs. SCI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLULUSCI
Return on Equity (TTM)42.05%32.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.10%3.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.38%12.60%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.88%22.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.10%26.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

2.27

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.27 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

SCI

0.61

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
2.31
Median
1.58
Q1
0.90
Min
0.46

SCI’s Current Ratio of 0.61 falls into the lower quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LULU vs. SCI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SCI

3.23

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.64
Median
0.19
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.23, SCI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Diversified Consumer Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LULU vs. SCI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SCI

3.62

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
54.22
Q3
32.36
Median
10.70
Q1
4.19
Min
1.66

In the lower quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, SCI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.62 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LULU vs. SCI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLULUSCI
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.270.61
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.850.56
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.003.23
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-47.833.62

Growth

Revenue Growth

LULU vs. SCI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LULU vs. SCI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SCI

1.54%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
2.95%
Q3
1.55%
Median
0.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SCI’s Dividend Yield of 1.54% is consistent with its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LULU vs. SCI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SCI

33.29%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
52.37%
Q3
25.79%
Median
0.07%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SCI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.29% is in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LULU vs. SCI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLULUSCI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.54%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%33.29%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LULU

12.01

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 12.01 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SCI

21.63

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
38.85
Q3
31.29
Median
22.33
Q1
15.56
Min
7.57

SCI’s P/E Ratio of 21.63 is within the middle range for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LULU vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LULU

1.97

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 1.97 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SCI

2.73

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.78
Min
1.07

SCI’s P/S Ratio of 2.73 aligns with the market consensus for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LULU vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

5.37

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 5.37 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SCI

7.43

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
7.43
Q3
5.06
Median
3.19
Q1
1.95
Min
0.95

SCI’s P/B Ratio of 7.43 is in the upper tier for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LULU vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLULUSCI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.0121.63
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.972.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.377.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.9018.34