Seek Returns logo

LULU vs. SBUX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LULU and SBUX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLULUSBUX
Company Namelululemon athletica inc.Starbucks Corporation
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization24.64 billion USD99.64 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJuly 27, 2007June 26, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LULU and SBUX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LULU vs. SBUX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLULUSBUX
5-Day Price Return3.73%-1.02%
13-Week Price Return-36.00%0.75%
26-Week Price Return-42.73%-21.56%
52-Week Price Return-24.33%-8.33%
Month-to-Date Return2.51%-1.68%
Year-to-Date Return-46.24%-3.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.58M7.92M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.05M10.17M
3-Month Volatility51.54%27.67%
Beta1.101.02

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LULU

43.48%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 43.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SBUX

115.68%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

SBUX’s Return on Equity of 115.68% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LULU vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LULU

16.82%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.82% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SBUX

7.18%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

SBUX’s Net Profit Margin of 7.18% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LULU vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LULU

23.36%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.36% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SBUX

10.81%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

SBUX’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.81% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LULU vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLULUSBUX
Return on Equity (TTM)43.48%115.68%
Return on Assets (TTM)25.05%8.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.82%7.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.36%10.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.34%23.74%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

2.28

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.28 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SBUX

0.76

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

SBUX’s Current Ratio of 0.76 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LULU vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SBUX

8.07

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

SBUX’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.07. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LULU vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SBUX

37.01

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 37.01, SBUX demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LULU vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLULUSBUX
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.280.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.980.52
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.008.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-47.8337.01

Growth

Revenue Growth

LULU vs. SBUX: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LULU vs. SBUX: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SBUX

2.66%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.66%, SBUX offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LULU vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SBUX

103.48%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SBUX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 103.48% is in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LULU vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLULUSBUX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.66%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%103.48%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LULU

13.67

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 13.67 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SBUX

38.96

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

A P/E Ratio of 38.96 places SBUX in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LULU vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LULU

2.30

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.30 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SBUX

2.80

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

SBUX’s P/S Ratio of 2.80 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LULU vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

7.80

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 7.80 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SBUX

64.12

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 64.12, SBUX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LULU vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLULUSBUX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)13.6738.96
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.302.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.8064.12
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.5740.21