Seek Returns logo

LULU vs. PKG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LULU and PKG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLULUPKG
Company Namelululemon athletica inc.Packaging Corporation of America
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization20.91 billion USD19.43 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 27, 2007January 28, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LULU and PKG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LULU vs. PKG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLULUPKG
5-Day Price Return-0.72%1.21%
13-Week Price Return-25.11%15.64%
26-Week Price Return-47.33%9.24%
52-Week Price Return-36.46%1.03%
Month-to-Date Return-12.00%-0.01%
Year-to-Date Return-53.47%-3.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.44M0.60M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.60M0.73M
3-Month Volatility50.44%26.54%
Beta1.080.97

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LULU

42.05%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 42.05% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PKG

20.33%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

In the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, PKG’s Return on Equity of 20.33% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LULU vs. PKG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LULU

16.38%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.38% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PKG

10.47%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.47% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LULU vs. PKG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LULU

22.88%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.88% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PKG

14.39%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.39% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LULU vs. PKG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLULUPKG
Return on Equity (TTM)42.05%20.33%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.10%10.16%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.38%10.47%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.88%14.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.10%22.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

2.27

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.27 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PKG

3.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

PKG’s Current Ratio of 3.54 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

LULU vs. PKG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PKG

0.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

PKG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LULU vs. PKG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

PKG

26.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.71, PKG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LULU vs. PKG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLULUPKG
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.273.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.852.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-47.8326.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

LULU vs. PKG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LULU vs. PKG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PKG

2.29%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Yield of 2.29% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LULU vs. PKG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PKG

49.67%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.67% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LULU vs. PKG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLULUPKG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%49.67%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LULU

12.50

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 12.50 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PKG

21.67

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

A P/E Ratio of 21.67 places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LULU vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LULU

2.05

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.05 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PKG

2.27

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

With a P/S Ratio of 2.27, PKG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Containers & Packaging industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LULU vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

5.37

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 5.37 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PKG

3.66

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

PKG’s P/B Ratio of 3.66 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LULU vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLULUPKG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.5021.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.052.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.373.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.5131.44