LULU vs. MCD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at LULU and MCD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | LULU | MCD |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | lululemon athletica inc. | McDonald's Corporation |
| Country | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry | Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure |
| Market Capitalization | 20.73 billion USD | 210.09 billion USD |
| Exchange | NasdaqGS | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 27, 2007 | July 5, 1966 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of LULU and MCD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | LULU | MCD |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | -1.90% | -1.83% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -25.89% | 0.47% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -31.62% | -7.50% |
| 52-Week Price Return | -35.84% | -2.14% |
| Month-to-Date Return | -1.75% | -3.12% |
| Year-to-Date Return | -54.28% | 1.56% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 3.90M | 2.77M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 4.69M | 3.48M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 49.37% | 14.19% |
| Beta | 1.03 | 0.53 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
LULU
42.05%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 42.05%
- Q3
- 24.41%
- Median
- 17.18%
- Q1
- 7.87%
- Min
- -8.23%
In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 42.05% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
MCD
95.13%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 84.03%
- Q3
- 40.12%
- Median
- 17.38%
- Q1
- 7.45%
- Min
- -33.94%
MCD’s Return on Equity of 95.13% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
LULU
16.38%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 21.16%
- Q3
- 13.26%
- Median
- 6.06%
- Q1
- 3.93%
- Min
- -3.05%
A Net Profit Margin of 16.38% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
MCD
32.21%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 25.61%
- Q3
- 14.65%
- Median
- 8.66%
- Q1
- 3.36%
- Min
- -9.83%
MCD’s Net Profit Margin of 32.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
LULU
22.88%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 29.47%
- Q3
- 20.87%
- Median
- 11.68%
- Q1
- 6.26%
- Min
- -0.12%
An Operating Profit Margin of 22.88% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
MCD
45.80%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 45.80%
- Q3
- 22.44%
- Median
- 14.98%
- Q1
- 6.59%
- Min
- -15.28%
An Operating Profit Margin of 45.80% places MCD in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | LULU | MCD |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 42.05% | 95.13% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 24.10% | 14.78% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 16.38% | 32.21% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 22.88% | 45.80% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 59.10% | 57.00% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
LULU
2.27
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 2.94
- Q3
- 2.22
- Median
- 1.61
- Q1
- 1.48
- Min
- 0.74
LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.27 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
MCD
1.30
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 2.73
- Q3
- 1.63
- Median
- 1.12
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.18
MCD’s Current Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
LULU
0.00
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 2.79
- Q3
- 1.32
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
MCD
40.64
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 11.29
- Q3
- 4.71
- Median
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 40.64, MCD operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
LULU
-47.83
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 57.00
- Q3
- 32.83
- Median
- 7.87
- Q1
- 3.52
- Min
- -32.49
LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
MCD
9.26
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 21.72
- Q3
- 11.40
- Median
- 4.02
- Q1
- 1.19
- Min
- -11.84
MCD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | LULU | MCD |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.27 | 1.30 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.85 | 1.03 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.00 | 40.64 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -47.83 | 9.26 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 5.22%
- Q3
- 3.07%
- Median
- 2.34%
- Q1
- 1.11%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
MCD
2.37%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 6.81%
- Q3
- 2.73%
- Median
- 0.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MCD’s Dividend Yield of 2.37% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 156.63%
- Q3
- 94.60%
- Median
- 52.65%
- Q1
- 35.04%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
MCD
59.51%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 128.39%
- Q3
- 61.60%
- Median
- 21.91%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MCD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.51% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | LULU | MCD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.37% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 59.51% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
LULU
12.01
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 48.15
- Q3
- 33.82
- Median
- 20.70
- Q1
- 14.57
- Min
- 7.12
In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 12.01 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
MCD
25.10
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 56.96
- Q3
- 33.82
- Median
- 21.30
- Q1
- 15.75
- Min
- 6.06
MCD’s P/E Ratio of 25.10 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
LULU
1.97
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 4.35
- Q3
- 3.06
- Median
- 1.66
- Q1
- 0.83
- Min
- 0.26
LULU’s P/S Ratio of 1.97 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
MCD
8.09
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 7.19
- Q3
- 3.99
- Median
- 1.93
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- 0.17
With a P/S Ratio of 8.09, MCD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
LULU
5.37
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 9.74
- Q3
- 5.59
- Median
- 3.41
- Q1
- 2.01
- Min
- 0.56
LULU’s P/B Ratio of 5.37 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
MCD
160.46
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 24.89
- Q3
- 11.60
- Median
- 4.91
- Q1
- 2.29
- Min
- 0.37
At 160.46, MCD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | LULU | MCD |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 12.01 | 25.10 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 1.97 | 8.09 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 5.37 | 160.46 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 14.90 | 30.54 |