LULU vs. MCD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at LULU and MCD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | LULU | MCD |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | lululemon athletica inc. | McDonald's Corporation |
| Country | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry | Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure |
| Market Capitalization | 24.88 billion USD | 224.12 billion USD |
| Exchange | NasdaqGS | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 27, 2007 | July 5, 1966 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of LULU and MCD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | LULU | MCD |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | 1.95% | 1.74% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -34.63% | -0.75% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -44.26% | 3.03% |
| 52-Week Price Return | -21.85% | 8.41% |
| Month-to-Date Return | 3.52% | 4.67% |
| Year-to-Date Return | -45.72% | 8.34% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 3.72M | 3.23M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 3.01M | 3.46M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 51.74% | 15.46% |
| Beta | 1.10 | 0.52 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
LULU
43.48%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 53.33%
- Q3
- 26.13%
- Median
- 18.47%
- Q1
- 7.99%
- Min
- -10.49%
In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 43.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
MCD
95.13%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 83.01%
- Q3
- 39.51%
- Median
- 17.38%
- Q1
- 5.32%
- Min
- -45.92%
MCD’s Return on Equity of 95.13% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
LULU
16.82%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 23.35%
- Q3
- 13.49%
- Median
- 8.45%
- Q1
- 4.18%
- Min
- -3.90%
A Net Profit Margin of 16.82% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
MCD
32.21%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 26.45%
- Q3
- 14.67%
- Median
- 8.69%
- Q1
- 3.34%
- Min
- -11.30%
MCD’s Net Profit Margin of 32.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
LULU
23.36%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 29.47%
- Q3
- 20.87%
- Median
- 13.00%
- Q1
- 7.02%
- Min
- -3.59%
An Operating Profit Margin of 23.36% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
MCD
45.80%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 38.76%
- Q3
- 21.15%
- Median
- 14.20%
- Q1
- 6.43%
- Min
- -14.56%
MCD’s Operating Profit Margin of 45.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | LULU | MCD |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 43.48% | 95.13% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 25.05% | 14.78% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 16.82% | 32.21% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 23.36% | 45.80% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 59.34% | 57.00% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
LULU
2.28
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 3.91
- Q3
- 2.49
- Median
- 1.89
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.80
LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.28 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
MCD
1.30
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 2.68
- Q3
- 1.62
- Median
- 1.11
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.19
MCD’s Current Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
LULU
0.00
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 2.67
- Q3
- 1.29
- Median
- 0.59
- Q1
- 0.24
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
MCD
40.64
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 9.88
- Q3
- 4.54
- Median
- 1.52
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 40.64, MCD operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
LULU
-47.83
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 57.00
- Q3
- 35.85
- Median
- 9.20
- Q1
- 4.29
- Min
- -32.49
LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
MCD
9.26
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 26.88
- Q3
- 11.95
- Median
- 3.87
- Q1
- 1.19
- Min
- -11.84
MCD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | LULU | MCD |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.28 | 1.30 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.98 | 1.03 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.00 | 40.64 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -47.83 | 9.26 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 6.59%
- Q3
- 3.60%
- Median
- 2.59%
- Q1
- 0.95%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
MCD
2.24%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 5.88%
- Q3
- 2.37%
- Median
- 0.68%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MCD’s Dividend Yield of 2.24% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 195.44%
- Q3
- 106.47%
- Median
- 58.77%
- Q1
- 36.52%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
MCD
59.51%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 127.31%
- Q3
- 56.79%
- Median
- 19.58%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MCD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.51% is in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | LULU | MCD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.24% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 59.51% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
LULU
13.67
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 63.29
- Q3
- 34.64
- Median
- 18.01
- Q1
- 13.88
- Min
- 6.04
In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 13.67 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
MCD
26.59
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 59.44
- Q3
- 33.98
- Median
- 22.25
- Q1
- 15.53
- Min
- 7.61
MCD’s P/E Ratio of 26.59 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
LULU
2.30
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 5.46
- Q3
- 3.13
- Median
- 1.72
- Q1
- 0.83
- Min
- 0.26
LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.30 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
MCD
8.56
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 7.74
- Q3
- 3.88
- Median
- 2.05
- Q1
- 1.19
- Min
- 0.17
With a P/S Ratio of 8.56, MCD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
LULU
7.80
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 9.76
- Q3
- 6.00
- Median
- 3.26
- Q1
- 1.97
- Min
- 0.69
LULU’s P/B Ratio of 7.80 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
MCD
160.46
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 20.90
- Q3
- 9.78
- Median
- 4.29
- Q1
- 2.22
- Min
- 0.47
At 160.46, MCD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | LULU | MCD |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 13.67 | 26.59 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 2.30 | 8.56 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 7.80 | 160.46 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 15.57 | 32.36 |