LULU vs. MAR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 17, 2025

Here’s a clear look at LULU and MAR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	LULU	MAR
Company Name	lululemon athletica inc.	Marriott International, Inc.
Country	Canada	United States
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization	20.20 billion USD	77.95 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	July 27, 2007	March 23, 1998
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LULU and MAR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LULU vs. MAR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	LULU	MAR
5-Day Price Return	6.03%	6.70%
13-Week Price Return	-8.63%	12.60%
26-Week Price Return	-38.21%	13.47%
52-Week Price Return	-45.97%	4.61%
Month-to-Date Return	-0.11%	11.47%
Year-to-Date Return	-55.45%	4.13%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.78M	1.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume	4.58M	1.45M
3-Month Volatility	51.65%	25.17%
Beta	1.03	1.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LULU

42.05%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 42.05%
Q3: 24.41%
Median: 17.18%
Q1: 7.87%
Min: -8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 42.05% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MAR

309.12%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 84.03%
Q3: 40.12%
Median: 17.38%
Q1: 7.45%
Min: -33.94%

MAR’s Return on Equity of 309.12% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LULU vs. MAR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LULU

16.38%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 21.16%
Q3: 13.26%
Median: 6.06%
Q1: 3.93%
Min: -3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.38% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MAR

10.07%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 25.61%
Q3: 14.65%
Median: 8.66%
Q1: 3.36%
Min: -9.83%

MAR’s Net Profit Margin of 10.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LULU vs. MAR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LULU

22.88%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 29.47%
Q3: 20.87%
Median: 11.68%
Q1: 6.26%
Min: -0.12%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.88% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MAR

15.88%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 45.80%
Q3: 22.44%
Median: 14.98%
Q1: 6.59%
Min: -15.28%

MAR’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.88% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LULU vs. MAR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	LULU	MAR
Return on Equity (TTM)	42.05%	309.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)	24.10%	9.67%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	16.38%	10.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	22.88%	15.88%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	59.10%	20.64%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

2.27

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 2.94
Q3: 2.22
Median: 1.61
Q1: 1.48
Min: 0.74

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.27 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MAR

0.47

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 2.73
Q3: 1.63
Median: 1.12
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.18

MAR’s Current Ratio of 0.47 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LULU vs. MAR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 2.79
Q3: 1.32
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MAR

76.12

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 11.29
Q3: 4.71
Median: 1.65
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 76.12, MAR operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LULU vs. MAR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 57.00
Q3: 32.83
Median: 7.87
Q1: 3.52
Min: -32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MAR

5.87

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 21.72
Q3: 11.40
Median: 4.02
Q1: 1.19
Min: -11.84

MAR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.87 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LULU vs. MAR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	LULU	MAR
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.27	0.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.85	0.43
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.00	76.12
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	-47.83	5.87

Growth

Revenue Growth

LULU vs. MAR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LULU vs. MAR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 5.22%
Q3: 3.07%
Median: 2.34%
Q1: 1.11%
Min: 0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MAR

0.92%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 6.81%
Q3: 2.73%
Median: 0.74%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MAR’s Dividend Yield of 0.92% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LULU vs. MAR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 156.63%
Q3: 94.60%
Median: 52.65%
Q1: 35.04%
Min: 0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MAR

27.38%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 128.39%
Q3: 61.60%
Median: 21.91%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MAR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.38% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LULU vs. MAR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	LULU	MAR
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.92%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	27.38%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LULU

11.51

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 48.15
Q3: 33.82
Median: 20.70
Q1: 14.57
Min: 7.12

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 11.51 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MAR

29.92

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 56.96
Q3: 33.82
Median: 21.30
Q1: 15.75
Min: 6.06

MAR’s P/E Ratio of 29.92 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LULU vs. MAR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LULU

1.88

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 4.35
Q3: 3.06
Median: 1.66
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 1.88 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MAR

3.01

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 7.19
Q3: 3.99
Median: 1.93
Q1: 1.26
Min: 0.17

MAR’s P/S Ratio of 3.01 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LULU vs. MAR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

5.37

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 9.74
Q3: 5.59
Median: 3.41
Q1: 2.01
Min: 0.56

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 5.37 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MAR

366.34

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 24.89
Q3: 11.60
Median: 4.91
Q1: 2.29
Min: 0.37

At 366.34, MAR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LULU vs. MAR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	LULU	MAR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	11.51	29.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.88	3.01
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	5.37	366.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	14.28	40.05