Seek Returns logo

LTM vs. XYL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LTM and XYL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LTM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, XYL is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolLTMXYL
Company Name--Xylem Inc.
CountryChileUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryPassenger AirlinesMachinery
Market Capitalization13.30 billion USD36.00 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 25, 2024October 13, 2011
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LTM and XYL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LTM vs. XYL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLTMXYL
5-Day Price Return-0.55%4.27%
13-Week Price Return17.60%14.02%
26-Week Price Return46.64%19.79%
52-Week Price Return64.89%9.66%
Month-to-Date Return-10.23%4.20%
Year-to-Date Return59.14%27.13%
10-Day Avg. Volume4,568.23M1.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume2,423.08M1.20M
3-Month Volatility31.50%25.90%
Beta0.661.16

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LTM

141.28%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
27.29%
Median
16.68%
Q1
8.40%
Min
-15.23%

LTM’s Return on Equity of 141.28% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

XYL

8.70%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

XYL’s Return on Equity of 8.70% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LTM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LTM

8.88%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
16.00%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.35%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-4.22%

LTM’s Net Profit Margin of 8.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

XYL

10.74%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

XYL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LTM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LTM

14.24%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.67%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.63%
Min
-2.30%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.24% places LTM in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

XYL

11.81%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

XYL’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.81% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LTM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLTMXYL
Return on Equity (TTM)141.28%8.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.44%5.66%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.88%10.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.24%11.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.19%37.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

0.60

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.91
Median
0.73
Q1
0.54
Min
0.18

LTM’s Current Ratio of 0.60 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

XYL

1.90

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

XYL’s Current Ratio of 1.90 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LTM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

8.22

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
10.23
Q3
5.04
Median
1.27
Q1
0.82
Min
0.00

LTM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Passenger Airlines industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.22. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

XYL

0.18

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, XYL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LTM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LTM

2.97

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
17.27
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

LTM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

XYL

55.35

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

XYL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 55.35 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LTM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLTMXYL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.601.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.531.31
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)8.220.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.9755.35

Growth

Revenue Growth

LTM vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LTM vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LTM

2.25%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
7.04%
Q3
3.76%
Median
1.72%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Yield of 2.25% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

XYL

1.03%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Yield of 1.03% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

LTM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LTM

49.16%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
99.73%
Q3
50.30%
Median
23.18%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.16% is within the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

XYL

39.55%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.55% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LTM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLTMXYL
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.25%1.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)49.16%39.55%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LTM

11.15

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
18.74
Q3
11.24
Median
8.33
Q1
6.11
Min
2.97

LTM’s P/E Ratio of 11.15 is within the middle range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

XYL

38.28

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

A P/E Ratio of 38.28 places XYL in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LTM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LTM

0.99

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.07
Q3
0.73
Median
0.62
Q1
0.40
Min
0.09

LTM’s P/S Ratio of 0.99 is in the upper echelon for the Passenger Airlines industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

XYL

4.11

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

XYL’s P/S Ratio of 4.11 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LTM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

12.96

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.47
Q3
3.19
Median
1.94
Q1
1.28
Min
0.50

At 12.96, LTM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Passenger Airlines industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

XYL

2.84

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

XYL’s P/B Ratio of 2.84 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LTM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLTMXYL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.1538.28
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.994.11
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.962.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.6441.22