LTM vs. VRT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 28, 2025

Here’s a clear look at LTM and VRT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LTM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, VRT is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	LTM	VRT
Company Name	--	Vertiv Holdings Co
Country	Chile	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Passenger Airlines	Electrical Equipment
Market Capitalization	14.72 billion USD	49.38 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	July 25, 2024	August 2, 2018
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LTM and VRT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LTM vs. VRT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	LTM	VRT
5-Day Price Return	7.84%	2.16%
13-Week Price Return	33.71%	17.78%
26-Week Price Return	54.55%	34.71%
52-Week Price Return	64.89%	65.65%
Month-to-Date Return	11.89%	-11.19%
Year-to-Date Return	73.34%	13.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume	4,531.67M	5.93M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2,050.80M	7.48M
3-Month Volatility	24.47%	40.17%
Beta	0.58	1.85

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LTM

141.28%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 49.96%
Q3: 28.15%
Median: 15.41%
Q1: 8.29%
Min: -11.01%

LTM’s Return on Equity of 141.28% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VRT

32.36%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 37.56%
Q3: 20.60%
Median: 14.38%
Q1: 4.35%
Min: 0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, VRT’s Return on Equity of 32.36% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LTM vs. VRT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LTM

8.88%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 17.65%
Q3: 8.90%
Median: 5.80%
Q1: 2.02%
Min: -3.12%

LTM’s Net Profit Margin of 8.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VRT

8.93%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 20.43%
Q3: 10.97%
Median: 6.07%
Q1: 3.16%
Min: 0.29%

VRT’s Net Profit Margin of 8.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LTM vs. VRT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LTM

14.24%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.47%
Q3: 12.33%
Median: 8.62%
Q1: 4.43%
Min: -2.88%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.24% places LTM in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VRT

13.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 26.20%
Q3: 14.31%
Median: 7.54%
Q1: 3.77%
Min: -5.64%

VRT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.20% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LTM vs. VRT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	LTM	VRT
Return on Equity (TTM)	141.28%	32.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)	7.44%	8.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	8.88%	8.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	14.24%	13.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	27.19%	35.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

0.60

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.46
Q3: 0.94
Median: 0.76
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.17

LTM’s Current Ratio of 0.60 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VRT

1.74

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 3.02
Q3: 1.99
Median: 1.41
Q1: 1.07
Min: 0.80

VRT’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LTM vs. VRT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

8.22

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 9.80
Q3: 4.82
Median: 1.30
Q1: 0.89
Min: 0.00

LTM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Passenger Airlines industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.22. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VRT

0.93

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 1.44
Q3: 0.99
Median: 0.56
Q1: 0.24
Min: 0.00

VRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LTM vs. VRT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LTM

2.97

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.60
Q3: 16.29
Median: 6.75
Q1: 1.94
Min: -8.55

LTM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VRT

2.36

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 36.12
Q3: 19.29
Median: 9.38
Q1: 1.16
Min: -10.92

VRT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LTM vs. VRT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	LTM	VRT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.60	1.74
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.53	1.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	8.22	0.93
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	2.97	2.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

LTM vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LTM vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LTM

2.14%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 6.71%
Q3: 3.95%
Median: 1.10%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Yield of 2.14% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRT

0.11%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 2.20%
Q3: 1.53%
Median: 1.01%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Yield of 0.11% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LTM vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LTM

49.16%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 71.59%
Q3: 38.54%
Median: 8.16%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.16% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

VRT

6.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 119.44%
Q3: 51.87%
Median: 27.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LTM vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	LTM	VRT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.14%	0.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	49.16%	6.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LTM

11.74

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 13.29
Q3: 11.94
Median: 8.78
Q1: 7.42
Min: 3.07

LTM’s P/E Ratio of 11.74 is within the middle range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VRT

59.82

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 81.85
Q3: 44.17
Median: 27.61
Q1: 18.62
Min: 7.73

A P/E Ratio of 59.82 places VRT in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LTM vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LTM

1.04

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.09
Q3: 0.74
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.44
Min: 0.09

LTM’s P/S Ratio of 1.04 is in the upper echelon for the Passenger Airlines industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VRT

5.34

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 8.18
Q3: 4.02
Median: 1.84
Q1: 0.97
Min: 0.44

VRT’s P/S Ratio of 5.34 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LTM vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

12.93

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 3.44
Q3: 2.89
Median: 1.84
Q1: 1.22
Min: 0.56

At 12.93, LTM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Passenger Airlines industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VRT

15.66

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 8.50
Q3: 4.53
Median: 3.39
Q1: 1.70
Min: 0.51

At 15.66, VRT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LTM vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	LTM	VRT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	11.74	59.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.04	5.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	12.93	15.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	10.15	39.11