Seek Returns logo

LTM vs. SYM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LTM and SYM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LTM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, SYM is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolLTMSYM
Company Name--Symbotic Inc.
CountryChileUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryPassenger AirlinesMachinery
Market Capitalization14.63 billion USD27.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGM
Listing DateJuly 25, 2024March 9, 2021
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LTM and SYM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LTM vs. SYM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLTMSYM
5-Day Price Return5.48%-2.27%
13-Week Price Return32.55%55.42%
26-Week Price Return50.72%70.93%
52-Week Price Return64.89%105.39%
Month-to-Date Return8.56%-15.22%
Year-to-Date Return68.17%92.91%
10-Day Avg. Volume3,892.38M1.89M
3-Month Avg. Volume1,983.74M2.04M
3-Month Volatility24.83%90.87%
Beta0.582.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LTM

141.28%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
28.15%
Median
15.41%
Q1
8.29%
Min
-11.01%

LTM’s Return on Equity of 141.28% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SYM

-7.69%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

SYM has a negative Return on Equity of -7.69%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

LTM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LTM

8.88%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
17.65%
Q3
8.90%
Median
5.80%
Q1
2.02%
Min
-3.12%

LTM’s Net Profit Margin of 8.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SYM

-0.71%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

SYM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.71%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

LTM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LTM

14.24%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.33%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-2.88%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.24% places LTM in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SYM

-5.20%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

SYM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.20%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

LTM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLTMSYM
Return on Equity (TTM)141.28%-7.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.44%-0.88%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.88%-0.71%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.24%-5.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.19%16.30%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

0.60

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.94
Median
0.76
Q1
0.54
Min
0.17

LTM’s Current Ratio of 0.60 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SYM

1.08

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

SYM’s Current Ratio of 1.08 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LTM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

8.22

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
9.80
Q3
4.82
Median
1.30
Q1
0.89
Min
0.00

LTM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Passenger Airlines industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.22. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SYM

0.00

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SYM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LTM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LTM

2.97

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
16.29
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

LTM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SYM

--

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

Interest Coverage Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

LTM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLTMSYM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.601.08
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.530.90
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)8.220.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.97--

Growth

Revenue Growth

LTM vs. SYM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LTM vs. SYM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LTM

2.14%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
3.95%
Median
1.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Yield of 2.14% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

SYM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LTM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LTM

49.16%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
71.59%
Q3
38.54%
Median
8.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.16% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

SYM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LTM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLTMSYM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.14%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)49.16%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LTM

11.74

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
13.29
Q3
11.94
Median
8.78
Q1
7.42
Min
3.07

LTM’s P/E Ratio of 11.74 is within the middle range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SYM

--

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

P/E Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

LTM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LTM

1.04

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.74
Median
0.61
Q1
0.44
Min
0.09

LTM’s P/S Ratio of 1.04 is in the upper echelon for the Passenger Airlines industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SYM

11.92

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 11.92, SYM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Machinery industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LTM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

12.93

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
2.89
Median
1.84
Q1
1.22
Min
0.56

At 12.93, LTM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Passenger Airlines industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SYM

108.69

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

At 108.69, SYM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LTM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLTMSYM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.74--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.0411.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.93108.69
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.1554.72