Seek Returns logo

LTM vs. RSG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LTM and RSG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LTM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, RSG is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolLTMRSG
Company Name--Republic Services, Inc.
CountryChileUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryPassenger AirlinesCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization13.74 billion USD73.72 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 25, 2024July 1, 1998
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LTM and RSG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LTM vs. RSG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLTMRSG
5-Day Price Return6.05%1.55%
13-Week Price Return27.40%-5.70%
26-Week Price Return42.67%5.18%
52-Week Price Return64.89%15.20%
Month-to-Date Return2.96%2.37%
Year-to-Date Return59.50%17.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume2,100.86M1.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume1,815.43M1.35M
3-Month Volatility24.48%18.33%
Beta0.540.62

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LTM

141.28%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
28.15%
Median
15.41%
Q1
8.29%
Min
-11.01%

LTM’s Return on Equity of 141.28% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RSG

18.34%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

In the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, RSG’s Return on Equity of 18.34% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LTM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LTM

8.88%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
17.65%
Q3
8.90%
Median
5.80%
Q1
2.02%
Min
-3.12%

LTM’s Net Profit Margin of 8.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RSG

12.98%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.98% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LTM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LTM

14.24%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.33%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-2.88%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.24% places LTM in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RSG

20.24%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.24% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LTM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLTMRSG
Return on Equity (TTM)141.28%18.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.44%6.50%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.88%12.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.24%20.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.19%42.28%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

0.60

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.94
Median
0.76
Q1
0.54
Min
0.17

LTM’s Current Ratio of 0.60 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RSG

0.66

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

RSG’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LTM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

8.22

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
9.80
Q3
4.82
Median
1.30
Q1
0.89
Min
0.00

LTM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Passenger Airlines industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.22. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

RSG

1.08

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

RSG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.08 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LTM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LTM

2.97

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
16.29
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

LTM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RSG

4.10

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

RSG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.10 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LTM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLTMRSG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.600.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.530.60
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)8.221.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.974.10

Growth

Revenue Growth

LTM vs. RSG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LTM vs. RSG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LTM

2.14%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
3.95%
Median
1.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Yield of 2.14% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RSG

0.96%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

RSG’s Dividend Yield of 0.96% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LTM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LTM

49.16%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
71.59%
Q3
38.54%
Median
8.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.16% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

RSG

33.52%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

RSG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.52% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LTM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLTMRSG
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.14%0.96%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)49.16%33.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LTM

11.74

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
13.29
Q3
11.94
Median
8.78
Q1
7.42
Min
3.07

LTM’s P/E Ratio of 11.74 is within the middle range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RSG

34.91

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

RSG’s P/E Ratio of 34.91 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LTM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LTM

1.04

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.74
Median
0.61
Q1
0.44
Min
0.09

LTM’s P/S Ratio of 1.04 is in the upper echelon for the Passenger Airlines industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RSG

4.53

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

RSG’s P/S Ratio of 4.53 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LTM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

12.93

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
2.89
Median
1.84
Q1
1.22
Min
0.56

At 12.93, LTM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Passenger Airlines industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RSG

6.40

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

RSG’s P/B Ratio of 6.40 is in the upper tier for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LTM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLTMRSG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.7434.91
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.044.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.936.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.1531.49