LTM vs. RKLB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 23, 2025

Here’s a clear look at LTM and RKLB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LTM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, RKLB is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	LTM	RKLB
Company Name	--	Rocket Lab Corporation
Country	Chile	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Passenger Airlines	Aerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization	13.74 billion USD	19.63 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqCM
Listing Date	July 25, 2024	November 24, 2020
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LTM and RKLB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LTM vs. RKLB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	LTM	RKLB
5-Day Price Return	6.05%	-4.95%
13-Week Price Return	27.40%	57.71%
26-Week Price Return	42.67%	43.78%
52-Week Price Return	64.89%	465.92%
Month-to-Date Return	2.96%	-11.39%
Year-to-Date Return	59.50%	59.76%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2,100.86M	21.94M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1,815.43M	20.72M
3-Month Volatility	24.48%	73.27%
Beta	0.54	2.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LTM

141.28%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 49.96%
Q3: 28.15%
Median: 15.41%
Q1: 8.29%
Min: -11.01%

LTM’s Return on Equity of 141.28% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RKLB

-48.14%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 43.89%
Q3: 22.42%
Median: 12.50%
Q1: 5.21%
Min: -6.24%

RKLB has a negative Return on Equity of -48.14%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

LTM vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LTM

8.88%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 17.65%
Q3: 8.90%
Median: 5.80%
Q1: 2.02%
Min: -3.12%

LTM’s Net Profit Margin of 8.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RKLB

-45.87%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 14.54%
Q3: 8.08%
Median: 6.17%
Q1: 2.49%
Min: -1.63%

RKLB has a negative Net Profit Margin of -45.87%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

LTM vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LTM

14.24%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.47%
Q3: 12.33%
Median: 8.62%
Q1: 4.43%
Min: -2.88%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.24% places LTM in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RKLB

-44.08%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 16.63%
Q3: 10.38%
Median: 8.29%
Q1: 6.21%
Min: 0.95%

RKLB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -44.08%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

LTM vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	LTM	RKLB
Return on Equity (TTM)	141.28%	-48.14%
Return on Assets (TTM)	7.44%	-17.98%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	8.88%	-45.87%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	14.24%	-44.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	27.19%	29.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

0.60

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.46
Q3: 0.94
Median: 0.76
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.17

LTM’s Current Ratio of 0.60 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RKLB

2.67

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 3.09
Q3: 1.98
Median: 1.23
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.02

RKLB’s Current Ratio of 2.67 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LTM vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

8.22

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 9.80
Q3: 4.82
Median: 1.30
Q1: 0.89
Min: 0.00

LTM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Passenger Airlines industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.22. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

RKLB

0.63

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 1.70
Q3: 1.04
Median: 0.68
Q1: 0.41
Min: 0.00

RKLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.63 is typical for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LTM vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LTM

2.97

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.60
Q3: 16.29
Median: 6.75
Q1: 1.94
Min: -8.55

LTM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RKLB

-45.87

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 36.57
Q3: 19.90
Median: 7.04
Q1: 2.40
Min: -7.63

RKLB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -45.87. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

LTM vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	LTM	RKLB
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.60	2.67
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.53	2.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	8.22	0.63
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	2.97	-45.87

Growth

Revenue Growth

LTM vs. RKLB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LTM vs. RKLB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LTM

2.14%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 6.71%
Q3: 3.95%
Median: 1.10%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Yield of 2.14% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RKLB

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 2.03%
Q3: 1.22%
Median: 0.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RKLB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LTM vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LTM

49.16%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 71.59%
Q3: 38.54%
Median: 8.16%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.16% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

RKLB

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 83.87%
Q3: 49.90%
Median: 16.48%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RKLB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LTM vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	LTM	RKLB
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.14%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	49.16%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LTM

11.74

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 13.29
Q3: 11.94
Median: 8.78
Q1: 7.42
Min: 3.07

LTM’s P/E Ratio of 11.74 is within the middle range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RKLB

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 65.97
Q3: 54.11
Median: 34.53
Q1: 23.66
Min: 0.00

P/E Ratio data for RKLB is currently unavailable.

LTM vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LTM

1.04

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.09
Q3: 0.74
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.44
Min: 0.09

LTM’s P/S Ratio of 1.04 is in the upper echelon for the Passenger Airlines industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RKLB

38.93

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 8.07
Q3: 4.49
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.39
Min: 0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 38.93, RKLB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LTM vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

12.93

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 3.44
Q3: 2.89
Median: 1.84
Q1: 1.22
Min: 0.56

At 12.93, LTM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Passenger Airlines industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RKLB

23.97

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 13.67
Q3: 7.92
Median: 4.65
Q1: 2.68
Min: 0.82

At 23.97, RKLB’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LTM vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	LTM	RKLB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	11.74	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.04	38.93
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	12.93	23.97
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	10.15	--