LTM vs. MMM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 27, 2025

Here’s a clear look at LTM and MMM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LTM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, MMM is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	LTM	MMM
Company Name	--	3M Company
Country	Chile	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Passenger Airlines	Industrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization	14.63 billion USD	83.01 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	July 25, 2024	January 2, 1962
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LTM and MMM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LTM vs. MMM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	LTM	MMM
5-Day Price Return	5.48%	0.98%
13-Week Price Return	32.55%	4.05%
26-Week Price Return	50.72%	3.76%
52-Week Price Return	64.89%	21.19%
Month-to-Date Return	8.56%	4.44%
Year-to-Date Return	68.17%	20.73%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3,892.38M	2.99M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1,983.74M	3.40M
3-Month Volatility	24.83%	23.22%
Beta	0.58	1.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LTM

141.28%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 49.96%
Q3: 28.15%
Median: 15.41%
Q1: 8.29%
Min: -11.01%

LTM’s Return on Equity of 141.28% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 21.93%
Q3: 14.23%
Median: 7.81%
Q1: 5.91%
Min: -3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LTM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LTM

8.88%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 17.65%
Q3: 8.90%
Median: 5.80%
Q1: 2.02%
Min: -3.12%

LTM’s Net Profit Margin of 8.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 18.70%
Q3: 12.58%
Median: 9.26%
Q1: 3.87%
Min: -2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LTM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LTM

14.24%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.47%
Q3: 12.33%
Median: 8.62%
Q1: 4.43%
Min: -2.88%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.24% places LTM in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 25.69%
Q3: 17.03%
Median: 12.85%
Q1: 8.81%
Min: -0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LTM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	LTM	MMM
Return on Equity (TTM)	141.28%	91.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)	7.44%	9.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	8.88%	16.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	14.24%	19.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	27.19%	41.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

0.60

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.46
Q3: 0.94
Median: 0.76
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.17

LTM’s Current Ratio of 0.60 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 2.19
Q3: 1.64
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.13
Min: 0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LTM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

8.22

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 9.80
Q3: 4.82
Median: 1.30
Q1: 0.89
Min: 0.00

LTM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Passenger Airlines industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.22. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 2.27
Q3: 1.47
Median: 0.99
Q1: 0.66
Min: 0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LTM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LTM

2.97

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.60
Q3: 16.29
Median: 6.75
Q1: 1.94
Min: -8.55

LTM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 11.17
Q3: 8.02
Median: 5.88
Q1: 2.73
Min: -2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

LTM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	LTM	MMM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.60	1.72
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.53	1.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	8.22	3.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	2.97	-15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

LTM vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LTM vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LTM

2.14%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 6.71%
Q3: 3.95%
Median: 1.10%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Yield of 2.14% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 10.17%
Q3: 5.53%
Median: 3.14%
Q1: 1.88%
Min: 0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

LTM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LTM

49.16%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 71.59%
Q3: 38.54%
Median: 8.16%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.16% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 181.91%
Q3: 95.57%
Median: 50.60%
Q1: 35.01%
Min: 1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LTM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	LTM	MMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.14%	1.88%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	49.16%	39.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LTM

11.74

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 13.29
Q3: 11.94
Median: 8.78
Q1: 7.42
Min: 3.07

LTM’s P/E Ratio of 11.74 is within the middle range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMM

20.92

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 36.98
Q3: 22.09
Median: 12.18
Q1: 8.93
Min: 5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.92 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LTM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LTM

1.04

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.09
Q3: 0.74
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.44
Min: 0.09

LTM’s P/S Ratio of 1.04 is in the upper echelon for the Passenger Airlines industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 3.60
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.68
Q1: 0.42
Min: 0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LTM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

12.93

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 3.44
Q3: 2.89
Median: 1.84
Q1: 1.22
Min: 0.56

At 12.93, LTM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Passenger Airlines industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 4.89
Q3: 2.51
Median: 1.06
Q1: 0.60
Min: 0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LTM vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	LTM	MMM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	11.74	20.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.04	3.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	12.93	18.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	10.15	30.86