Seek Returns logo

LRCX vs. NTAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LRCX and NTAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLRCXNTAP
Company NameLam Research CorporationNetApp, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization180.06 billion USD23.93 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 4, 1984November 21, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LRCX and NTAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LRCX vs. NTAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLRCXNTAP
5-Day Price Return4.35%-3.89%
13-Week Price Return37.56%11.18%
26-Week Price Return75.86%27.72%
52-Week Price Return61.89%-2.29%
Month-to-Date Return33.70%5.03%
Year-to-Date Return85.38%2.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume12.67M2.32M
3-Month Avg. Volume11.00M2.08M
3-Month Volatility34.87%23.54%
Beta1.881.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LRCX

58.48%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

LRCX’s Return on Equity of 58.48% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

NTAP

120.04%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
56.93%
Q3
27.52%
Median
9.18%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-1.04%

NTAP’s Return on Equity of 120.04% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LRCX vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LRCX

29.06%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 29.06% places LRCX in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NTAP

17.77%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
16.15%
Q3
7.95%
Median
4.80%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-0.29%

NTAP’s Net Profit Margin of 17.77% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

LRCX vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LRCX

32.01%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.01% places LRCX in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NTAP

20.70%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
20.70%
Q3
10.74%
Median
6.27%
Q1
4.07%
Min
1.97%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.70% places NTAP in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LRCX vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLRCXNTAP
Return on Equity (TTM)58.48%120.04%
Return on Assets (TTM)26.56%12.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)29.06%17.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.01%20.70%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.71%70.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LRCX

2.21

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

LRCX’s Current Ratio of 2.21 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NTAP

1.31

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.04
Median
1.41
Q1
0.98
Min
0.11

NTAP’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LRCX vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LRCX

0.45

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

LRCX’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.45 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NTAP

2.55

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.85
Median
0.32
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.55, NTAP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LRCX vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LRCX

94.65

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

LRCX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 94.65 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

NTAP

17.59

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
143.63
Q3
76.01
Median
19.47
Q1
5.91
Min
-23.93

NTAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LRCX vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLRCXNTAP
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.211.31
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.491.28
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.452.55
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)94.6517.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

LRCX vs. NTAP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LRCX vs. NTAP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LRCX

0.68%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LRCX’s Dividend Yield of 0.68% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NTAP

1.78%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.33%
Q3
3.29%
Median
1.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Yield of 1.78% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LRCX vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LRCX

21.45%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LRCX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.45% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NTAP

35.95%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
77.17%
Median
40.90%
Q1
3.87%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.95% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LRCX vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLRCXNTAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.68%1.78%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)21.45%35.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LRCX

31.35

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

LRCX’s P/E Ratio of 31.35 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NTAP

20.21

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.10
Q3
28.67
Median
19.23
Q1
15.53
Min
9.46

NTAP’s P/E Ratio of 20.21 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LRCX vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LRCX

9.11

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

LRCX’s P/S Ratio of 9.11 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NTAP

3.59

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
5.63
Q3
3.18
Median
1.10
Q1
0.49
Min
0.04

NTAP’s P/S Ratio of 3.59 is in the upper echelon for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LRCX vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LRCX

12.63

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

LRCX’s P/B Ratio of 12.63 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

NTAP

21.54

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.94
Q3
6.87
Median
1.88
Q1
0.94
Min
0.32

At 21.54, NTAP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LRCX vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLRCXNTAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.3520.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.113.59
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.6321.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)31.1014.27