Seek Returns logo

LOGI vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LOGI and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLOGIUBER
Company NameLogitech International S.A.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountrySwitzerlandUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsGround Transportation
Market Capitalization14.58 billion USD189.42 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 27, 1997May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LOGI and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LOGI vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLOGIUBER
5-Day Price Return4.42%-1.99%
13-Week Price Return21.66%3.10%
26-Week Price Return-9.88%29.78%
52-Week Price Return--31.14%
Month-to-Date Return4.89%3.51%
Year-to-Date Return6.42%50.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.77M21.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.71M21.23M
3-Month Volatility28.37%32.88%
Beta1.871.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LOGI

29.40%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

LOGI’s Return on Equity of 29.40% is on par with the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LOGI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LOGI

13.86%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.86% places LOGI in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LOGI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LOGI

14.38%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.38% places LOGI in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LOGI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLOGIUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)29.40%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.30%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.86%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.38%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)43.09%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LOGI

2.35

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

LOGI’s Current Ratio of 2.35 is in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LOGI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LOGI

0.00

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, LOGI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LOGI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LOGI

204.63

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

LOGI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 204.63 is in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

LOGI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLOGIUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.351.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.820.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)204.63-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

LOGI vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LOGI vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LOGI

1.40%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LOGI’s Dividend Yield of 1.40% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LOGI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LOGI

142.87%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LOGI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 142.87% is in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LOGI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLOGIUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.40%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)142.87%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LOGI

23.50

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

LOGI’s P/E Ratio of 23.50 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

14.99

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 14.99 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LOGI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LOGI

3.26

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

LOGI’s P/S Ratio of 3.26 is in the upper echelon for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER

4.00

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

UBER’s P/S Ratio of 4.00 is in the upper echelon for the Ground Transportation industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LOGI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LOGI

7.34

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

LOGI’s P/B Ratio of 7.34 is in the upper tier for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LOGI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLOGIUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.5014.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.264.00
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.348.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.8722.17