LNG vs. WMB: Cheniere Energy vs. Williams Stock Comparison
How do Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Williams (WMB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Williams (WMB) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | LNG | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cheniere Energy Inc. | The Williams Companies, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 56.76 billion USD | 80.11 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | April 4, 1994 | December 31, 1981 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | LNG | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 36.89% | 14.81% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.36% | 28.70% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 22.59% | 23.72% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | LNG | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 31.41% | 26.38% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.06 | 0.65 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -24.87% | -23.01% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.00M | 7.88M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | LNG | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.04 | 0.40 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.54 | 0.56 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 39.68% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Williams (WMB) at 18.31% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for LNG.
LNG
Energy industry group
39.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- LNG
- 39.68%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
WMB
Energy industry group
18.31%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- WMB
- 18.31%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Williams (WMB) at 24.66% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 13.40%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
LNG
Energy industry group
13.40%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- LNG
- 13.40%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
WMB
Energy industry group
24.66%
- Max
- 56.92%
- WMB
- 24.66%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 30.82% and Williams (WMB) at 32.69% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
LNG
Energy industry group
30.82%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- LNG
- 30.82%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
WMB
Energy industry group
32.69%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- WMB
- 32.69%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | LNG | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 39.68% | 18.31% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.61% | 4.59% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 13.40% | 24.66% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 30.82% | 32.69% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 34.89% | 63.05% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 27.21% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Williams (WMB) at 13.78% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for LNG.
EPS Growth
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 69.93% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Williams (WMB) at 17.58% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for LNG.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | LNG | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 27.21% | 13.78% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -15.77% | 2.91% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 69.93% | 17.58% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 62.34% | 8.62% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.90 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Williams (WMB) at 0.75 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for WMB.
LNG
Energy industry group
0.90
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- LNG
- 0.90
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
WMB
Energy industry group
0.75
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- WMB
- 0.75
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both balance sheets lean debt-heavy versus peers, but LNG is more stretched: Williams (WMB) at 1.58 sits in the higher-leverage quartile and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.31 is above its industry benchmark range.
LNG
Energy industry group
2.31
- LNG
- 2.31
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
WMB
Energy industry group
1.58
- Max
- 1.75
- WMB
- 1.58
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | LNG | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.90 | 0.75 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 2.31 | 1.58 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.26 | 4.58 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.82% and Williams (WMB) at 3.23% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
LNG
Energy industry group
0.82%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- LNG
- 0.82%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WMB
Energy industry group
3.23%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- WMB
- 3.23%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 15.80% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Williams (WMB) at 81.69% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
LNG
Energy industry group
15.80%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- LNG
- 15.80%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WMB
Energy industry group
81.69%
- Max
- 133.24%
- WMB
- 81.69%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | LNG | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.82% | 3.23% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 15.80% | 81.69% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 19.78 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Williams (WMB) at 25.23 sits in the richer quartile — WMB needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
LNG
Energy industry group
19.78
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- LNG
- 19.78
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
WMB
Energy industry group
25.23
- Max
- 39.54
- WMB
- 25.23
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.50 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Williams (WMB) at 6.32 clears its benchmark range — WMB looks notably rich on sales.
LNG
Energy industry group
2.50
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- LNG
- 2.50
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
WMB
Energy industry group
6.32
- WMB
- 6.32
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Measured against book value, both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 8.70 and Williams (WMB) at 5.11 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.
LNG
Energy industry group
8.70
- LNG
- 8.70
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
WMB
Energy industry group
5.11
- WMB
- 5.11
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LNG | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 19.78 | 25.23 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.50 | 6.32 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 8.70 | 5.11 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.17% | -3.56% |