Seek Returns logo

LNG vs. WDS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LNG and WDS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LNG is a standard domestic listing, while WDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolLNGWDS
Company NameCheniere Energy, Inc.Woodside Energy Group Ltd
CountryUnited StatesAustralia
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization47.68 billion USD33.03 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 4, 1994November 18, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LNG and WDS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LNG vs. WDS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLNGWDS
5-Day Price Return1.72%-0.30%
13-Week Price Return-6.50%1.26%
26-Week Price Return-7.53%22.60%
52-Week Price Return2.47%7.78%
Month-to-Date Return1.50%6.73%
Year-to-Date Return0.15%7.60%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.84M4.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.81M4.32M
3-Month Volatility15.97%26.32%
Beta0.261.22

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LNG

64.76%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
16.09%
Median
9.55%
Q1
5.28%
Min
-10.03%

LNG’s Return on Equity of 64.76% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

WDS

8.31%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
16.09%
Median
9.55%
Q1
5.28%
Min
-10.03%

WDS’s Return on Equity of 8.31% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LNG vs. WDS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LNG

21.12%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
43.98%
Q3
20.46%
Median
8.67%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-7.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.12% places LNG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WDS

21.42%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
43.98%
Q3
20.46%
Median
8.67%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-7.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.42% places WDS in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LNG vs. WDS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LNG

37.13%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
30.55%
Median
17.92%
Q1
6.58%
Min
-25.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 37.13% places LNG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

WDS

28.80%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
30.55%
Median
17.92%
Q1
6.58%
Min
-25.19%

WDS’s Operating Profit Margin of 28.80% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LNG vs. WDS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLNGWDS
Return on Equity (TTM)64.76%8.31%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.05%4.68%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.12%21.42%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)37.13%28.80%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.44%39.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LNG

0.94

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
1.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.85
Min
0.31

LNG’s Current Ratio of 0.94 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WDS

1.90

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
1.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.85
Min
0.31

WDS’s Current Ratio of 1.90 is in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LNG vs. WDS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LNG

3.34

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.34, LNG operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

WDS

0.38

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

WDS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LNG vs. WDS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LNG

7.46

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.04
Q3
20.96
Median
7.19
Q1
2.54
Min
-19.25

LNG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.46 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WDS

23.23

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.04
Q3
20.96
Median
7.19
Q1
2.54
Min
-19.25

WDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.23 is in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LNG vs. WDS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLNGWDS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.941.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.811.74
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.340.38
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.4623.23

Growth

Revenue Growth

LNG vs. WDS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LNG vs. WDS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LNG

0.95%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
11.17%
Q3
6.18%
Median
4.23%
Q1
2.56%
Min
0.00%

LNG’s Dividend Yield of 0.95% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

WDS

7.23%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
11.17%
Q3
6.18%
Median
4.23%
Q1
2.56%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 7.23%, WDS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LNG vs. WDS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LNG

11.09%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
177.24%
Q3
98.32%
Median
58.16%
Q1
28.57%
Min
0.00%

LNG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.09% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

WDS

78.46%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
177.24%
Q3
98.32%
Median
58.16%
Q1
28.57%
Min
0.00%

WDS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 78.46% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LNG vs. WDS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLNGWDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.95%7.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)11.09%78.46%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LNG

11.66

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
38.10
Q3
21.29
Median
13.95
Q1
9.93
Min
2.48

LNG’s P/E Ratio of 11.66 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

WDS

10.85

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
38.10
Q3
21.29
Median
13.95
Q1
9.93
Min
2.48

WDS’s P/E Ratio of 10.85 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LNG vs. WDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LNG

2.46

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.81
Median
1.43
Q1
0.60
Min
0.15

LNG’s P/S Ratio of 2.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WDS

2.32

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.81
Median
1.43
Q1
0.60
Min
0.15

WDS’s P/S Ratio of 2.32 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LNG vs. WDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LNG

7.65

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.41
Q1
0.94
Min
0.45

At 7.65, LNG’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WDS

0.82

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.41
Q1
0.94
Min
0.45

WDS’s P/B Ratio of 0.82 is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LNG vs. WDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLNGWDS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.6610.85
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.462.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.650.82
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.3332.19