LNG vs. WDS: Cheniere Energy vs. Woodside Energy Stock Comparison
How do Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Woodside Energy (WDS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Woodside Energy (WDS) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though LNG is classified under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation while WDS falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
Cheniere Energy (LNG) trades as ordinary local shares, while Woodside Energy (WDS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | LNG | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cheniere Energy Inc. | Woodside Energy Group Ltd ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | Australia |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 56.76 billion USD | 40.00 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | April 4, 1994 | November 18, 1996 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | LNG | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 36.89% | 30.30% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.36% | 5.67% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 22.59% | 11.65% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | LNG | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 31.41% | 33.53% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.06 | 0.38 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -24.87% | -48.77% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.00M | 570.04K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | LNG | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.04 | 0.78 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.54 | 1.11 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 39.68% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 7.68% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for LNG.
LNG
Energy industry group
39.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- LNG
- 39.68%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
WDS
Energy industry group
7.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- WDS
- 7.68%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 13.40% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 22.21% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
LNG
Energy industry group
13.40%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- LNG
- 13.40%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
WDS
Energy industry group
22.21%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- WDS
- 22.21%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 30.82% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 23.91% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
LNG
Energy industry group
30.82%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- LNG
- 30.82%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
WDS
Energy industry group
23.91%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- WDS
- 23.91%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | LNG | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 39.68% | 7.68% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.61% | 2.83% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 13.40% | 22.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 30.82% | 23.91% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 34.89% | 34.92% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 27.21% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at -1.48% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for LNG.
EPS Growth
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 69.93% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at -24.02% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for LNG.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | LNG | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 27.21% | -1.48% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -15.77% | -8.26% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 69.93% | -24.02% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 62.34% | -30.68% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.90 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.39 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
LNG
Energy industry group
0.90
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- LNG
- 0.90
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
WDS
Energy industry group
1.39
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- WDS
- 1.39
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 0.33 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.31 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
LNG
Energy industry group
2.31
- LNG
- 2.31
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
WDS
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- WDS
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | LNG | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.90 | 1.39 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 2.31 | 0.33 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.26 | 1.15 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 5.41% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.82% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, WDS the richer one.
LNG
Energy industry group
0.82%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- LNG
- 0.82%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WDS
Energy industry group
5.41%
- Max
- 8.57%
- WDS
- 5.41%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 15.80% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 69.78% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
LNG
Energy industry group
15.80%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- LNG
- 15.80%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WDS
Energy industry group
69.78%
- Max
- 133.24%
- WDS
- 69.78%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | LNG | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.82% | 5.41% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 15.80% | 69.78% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 19.78 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 13.15 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
LNG
Energy industry group
19.78
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- LNG
- 19.78
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
WDS
Energy industry group
13.15
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- WDS
- 13.15
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.50 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 2.89 sits in the pricier quartile — WDS costs more per dollar of sales.
LNG
Energy industry group
2.50
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- LNG
- 2.50
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
WDS
Energy industry group
2.89
- Max
- 5.40
- WDS
- 2.89
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.11 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 8.70 prices above its benchmark range — LNG looks rich relative to book.
LNG
Energy industry group
8.70
- LNG
- 8.70
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
WDS
Energy industry group
1.11
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- WDS
- 1.11
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LNG | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 19.78 | 13.15 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.50 | 2.89 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 8.70 | 1.11 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.17% | 1.41% |