LNG vs. TS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 5, 2025

Here’s a clear look at LNG and TS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LNG is a standard domestic listing, while TS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	LNG	TS
Company Name	Cheniere Energy, Inc.	Tenaris S.A.
Country	United States	Luxembourg
GICS Sector	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels	Energy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization	51.05 billion USD	19.50 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	April 4, 1994	December 16, 2002
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LNG and TS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LNG vs. TS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	LNG	TS
5-Day Price Return	-1.35%	2.14%
13-Week Price Return	-3.06%	-5.02%
26-Week Price Return	0.38%	-14.39%
52-Week Price Return	25.89%	5.51%
Month-to-Date Return	-1.15%	2.04%
Year-to-Date Return	8.10%	-14.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.44M	2.47M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.84M	2.15M
3-Month Volatility	24.97%	23.39%
Beta	0.28	0.72

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LNG

66.68%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 27.06%
Q3: 16.37%
Median: 10.02%
Q1: 5.32%
Min: -8.98%

LNG’s Return on Equity of 66.68% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TS

11.86%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 35.03%
Q3: 19.11%
Median: 12.78%
Q1: 7.55%
Min: -1.07%

TS’s Return on Equity of 11.86% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LNG vs. TS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LNG

21.05%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 48.48%
Q3: 21.05%
Median: 9.42%
Q1: 1.67%
Min: -26.95%

LNG’s Net Profit Margin of 21.05% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TS

17.02%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 17.17%
Q3: 9.96%
Median: 6.67%
Q1: 3.84%
Min: -0.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.02% places TS in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LNG vs. TS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LNG

37.61%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 62.28%
Q3: 31.04%
Median: 18.00%
Q1: 5.41%
Min: -32.54%

An Operating Profit Margin of 37.61% places LNG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TS

18.93%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 31.93%
Q3: 18.93%
Median: 11.31%
Q1: 4.98%
Min: 0.83%

TS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.93% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LNG vs. TS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	LNG	TS
Return on Equity (TTM)	66.68%	11.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)	8.79%	9.70%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	21.05%	17.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	37.61%	18.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	47.15%	33.79%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LNG

0.98

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 2.60
Q3: 1.63
Median: 1.22
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.30

LNG’s Current Ratio of 0.98 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TS

3.41

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 3.41
Q3: 2.08
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.10
Min: 0.68

TS’s Current Ratio of 3.41 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LNG vs. TS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LNG

3.37

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 2.16
Q3: 1.06
Median: 0.53
Q1: 0.25
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.37, LNG operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TS

0.03

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 2.06
Q3: 1.10
Median: 0.48
Q1: 0.34
Min: 0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LNG vs. TS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LNG

7.46

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 51.08
Q3: 22.26
Median: 7.32
Q1: 2.72
Min: -19.25

LNG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.46 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TS

101.80

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 49.88
Q3: 26.65
Median: 7.66
Q1: 2.15
Min: -17.36

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 101.80, TS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LNG vs. TS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	LNG	TS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.98	3.41
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.85	2.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	3.37	0.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	7.46	101.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

LNG vs. TS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LNG vs. TS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LNG

0.84%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 12.74%
Q3: 7.02%
Median: 4.37%
Q1: 2.64%
Min: 0.00%

LNG’s Dividend Yield of 0.84% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TS

4.61%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 8.36%
Q3: 4.38%
Median: 2.41%
Q1: 0.32%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.61%, TS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LNG vs. TS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LNG

11.25%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 188.73%
Q3: 95.12%
Median: 63.48%
Q1: 28.55%
Min: 0.00%

LNG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.25% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TS

85.87%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 169.85%
Q3: 94.25%
Median: 39.49%
Q1: 15.00%
Min: 0.00%

TS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LNG vs. TS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	LNG	TS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.84%	4.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	11.25%	85.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LNG

13.33

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 34.98
Q3: 21.60
Median: 13.15
Q1: 8.17
Min: 2.22

LNG’s P/E Ratio of 13.33 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TS

9.74

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 22.89
Q3: 18.22
Median: 13.03
Q1: 11.98
Min: 7.14

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s P/E Ratio of 9.74 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LNG vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LNG

2.81

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 4.68
Q3: 2.73
Median: 1.36
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.12

LNG’s P/S Ratio of 2.81 is in the upper echelon for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TS

1.66

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 2.84
Q3: 1.60
Median: 0.87
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.23

TS’s P/S Ratio of 1.66 is in the upper echelon for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LNG vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LNG

8.05

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 3.63
Q3: 2.11
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.91
Min: 0.34

At 8.05, LNG’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TS

1.21

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 4.44
Q3: 2.60
Median: 1.77
Q1: 1.17
Min: 0.24

TS’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LNG vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	LNG	TS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	13.33	9.74
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.81	1.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	8.05	1.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	16.21	10.47