Seek Returns logo

LMT vs. ULS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LMT and ULS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLMTULS
Company NameLockheed Martin CorporationUL Solutions Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseProfessional Services
Market Capitalization104.13 billion USD13.44 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962April 12, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LMT and ULS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LMT vs. ULS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLMTULS
5-Day Price Return1.98%0.09%
13-Week Price Return-5.72%-8.09%
26-Week Price Return2.59%16.65%
52-Week Price Return-20.13%24.93%
Month-to-Date Return5.94%-8.51%
Year-to-Date Return-8.22%34.12%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.47M1.15M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.66M0.90M
3-Month Volatility30.65%34.31%
Beta0.260.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LMT

65.82%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

LMT’s Return on Equity of 65.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ULS

34.07%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

In the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, ULS’s Return on Equity of 34.07% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LMT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LMT

5.85%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

LMT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ULS

11.08%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

ULS’s Net Profit Margin of 11.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LMT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LMT

8.29%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

LMT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.29% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ULS

16.71%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

ULS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.71% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LMT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLMTULS
Return on Equity (TTM)65.82%34.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.42%11.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.85%11.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.29%16.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.25%48.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

0.99

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

LMT’s Current Ratio of 0.99 falls into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ULS

1.32

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

ULS’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LMT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

4.06

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.06, LMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ULS

0.56

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

ULS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LMT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LMT

7.49

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

LMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ULS

11.92

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

ULS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LMT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLMTULS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.991.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.831.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)4.060.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.4911.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

LMT vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LMT vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LMT

2.99%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Yield of 2.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

ULS

0.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Yield of 0.76% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LMT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LMT

73.60%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 73.60% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ULS

31.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.19% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LMT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLMTULS
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.99%0.76%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)73.60%31.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LMT

24.64

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

LMT’s P/E Ratio of 24.64 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ULS

41.10

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 41.10 places ULS in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LMT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LMT

1.44

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

LMT’s P/S Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ULS

4.55

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

ULS’s P/S Ratio of 4.55 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LMT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

20.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

At 20.34, LMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ULS

13.37

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

ULS’s P/B Ratio of 13.37 is in the upper tier for the Professional Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LMT vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLMTULS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.6441.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.444.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)20.3413.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.7836.92