Seek Returns logo

LMT vs. TDG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LMT and TDG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLMTTDG
Company NameLockheed Martin CorporationTransDigm Group Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization103.32 billion USD80.34 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962March 15, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LMT and TDG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LMT vs. TDG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLMTTDG
5-Day Price Return2.74%-0.23%
13-Week Price Return-6.47%0.61%
26-Week Price Return-1.33%9.73%
52-Week Price Return-20.53%15.63%
Month-to-Date Return5.13%-11.36%
Year-to-Date Return-8.93%12.51%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.72M0.52M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.71M0.31M
3-Month Volatility32.09%29.88%
Beta0.261.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LMT

65.82%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

LMT’s Return on Equity of 65.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TDG

37.11%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

In the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, TDG’s Return on Equity of 37.11% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LMT vs. TDG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LMT

5.85%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

LMT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TDG

22.52%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

TDG’s Net Profit Margin of 22.52% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

LMT vs. TDG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LMT

8.29%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

LMT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.29% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TDG

45.94%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

TDG’s Operating Profit Margin of 45.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

LMT vs. TDG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLMTTDG
Return on Equity (TTM)65.82%37.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.42%8.43%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.85%22.52%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.29%45.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.25%60.12%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

0.99

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

LMT’s Current Ratio of 0.99 falls into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TDG

3.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

TDG’s Current Ratio of 3.13 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

LMT vs. TDG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

4.06

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.06, LMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TDG

5.41

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 5.41, TDG operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LMT vs. TDG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LMT

7.49

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

LMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TDG

2.72

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

TDG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.72 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LMT vs. TDG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLMTTDG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.993.13
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.832.07
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)4.065.41
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.492.72

Growth

Revenue Growth

LMT vs. TDG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LMT vs. TDG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LMT

3.03%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Yield of 3.03% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

TDG

5.52%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TDG’s Dividend Yield of 5.52% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

LMT vs. TDG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LMT

73.60%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 73.60% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

TDG

891.68%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 891.68%, TDG’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

LMT vs. TDG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLMTTDG
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.03%5.52%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)73.60%891.68%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LMT

24.29

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

LMT’s P/E Ratio of 24.29 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TDG

41.23

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

TDG’s P/E Ratio of 41.23 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LMT vs. TDG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LMT

1.42

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

LMT’s P/S Ratio of 1.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TDG

9.29

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 9.29, TDG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LMT vs. TDG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

20.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

At 20.34, LMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TDG

10.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

TDG’s P/B Ratio of 10.13 is in the upper tier for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LMT vs. TDG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLMTTDG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.2941.23
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.429.29
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)20.3410.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.4941.79